Interpreting the Virtues of Mindfulness and Compassion: Contemplative Practices and Virtue-Oriented Business Ethics

Abstract

The article aims to provide a standpoint from which to critically address two broad concerns. The first concern surrounds a naïve view of mindfulness, which takes it as a given that it is a good thing to cultivate mindfulness and attendant qualities like compassion because these virtues are key to improving the quality of life and bettering effective decisionmaking within business. Yet the virtue of mindfulness has roots in religious and spiritual traditions, and the virtue of compassion is complex and contextual; neither of these virtues operate in a vacuum. Nor do they function independently from other virtues and values. Reasonable people of goodwill possessing the virtues of mindfulness and compassion in good measure, may nevertheless strongly disagree about what the compassionate, mindful thing to do is, particularly in a business setting. It is, moreover, conceivable that intensively cultivating mindfulness and compassion could lead one to reject altogether the Bdog-eat dog^culture of competitive business that draws upon selective features of mindfulness meditation that lie in the corporate comfort zone yet which are not especially countercultural from a religious or spiritual vantage point. The second concern is that Western virtue-based business ethics is largely confined to academic philosophical theories. As such, virtue-driven business ethics is often more centered around developing theoretical wisdom than developing Bhard core^practical wisdom earned through yoga asanas, meditation, chanting, and breathing, whereas for contemplative practices the reverse is the case, with practical wisdom (Bknowing how-to^) emphasized over theoretical wisdom (Bknowing that^). Accordingly, the article examines prospects for cross-fertilization between, on the one hand, mindfulness and compassion interpreted as virtues in Eastern contemplative practices, and on the other hand, mindfulness and compassion as interpreted within Western virtue-oriented business ethics. Illuminating a pathway for such interpretative

Mindful Leader Development: How Leaders Experience the Effects of Mindfulness Training on Leader Capabilities

“…Emotional intelligence for instance, the ability to recognize and manage emotions in self and others, is related to team and leader performance (Ashkanasy and Dasborough, 2003; Ashkanasy and Dorris, 2017). There is also an ethical and virtuous aspect to managing emotions for leaders (Brown and Treviño, 2006; Jackson, 2018), a responsibility for acting in a way that causes the least amount of harm for others, grounded in an awareness that leader behaviors are strongly related to followers’ wellbeing, job and life satisfaction (Kelloway et al, 2005) and that both positive and negative emotions of leaders may be contagious. For example, increased levels of positive affect of leaders are associated with greater goal attainment and follower performance (Joseph et al, 2015).…”

Virtue and virtuousness in organizations: Guidelines for ascribing individual and organizational moral responsibility

“…Following Aristotelian virtue ethics, which focuses on moral appraisal, character, human flourishing, and excellence (Alzola, 2012, ; Annas, 2011; Foot, 2001; Jackson, 2018), we are primarily concerned with an ethics of being or of character and secondarily with an ethics of doing (Alzola, 2012; Appiah, 2008; Moore, 2005). Virtue ethics evaluates an action as good or right depending on whether it is what a virtuous agent would do in the given circumstances as a result of his character (NE, 1106b18‐24).…”

“…Virtue ethics evaluates an action as good or right depending on whether it is what a virtuous agent would do in the given circumstances as a result of his character (NE, 1106b18‐24). Hence, more attention is given to the way virtues determine and are internally expressed in the human character, rather than on how they are expressed in human actions (Jackson, 2018), in a nonreductive approach that preserves the inner aspects of virtue (Alzola, 2015). A virtuous act is thus dependent upon a virtuous person: “There is no such thing as an objectively virtuous action in itself, considered independently of the person who performs it” (Sison & Ferrero, 2015, p. 86).…”

“…Virtues as excellences of character pertain to lives as a whole (Alzola, 2012, 2015; Hartman, 2013; Sison & Ferrero, 2015) and require phronesis (prudence or practical wisdom). This is wisdom to discern rationally the proper course of action in a given situation, because virtuous actions take place relative to specific circumstances (Bright et al., 2014; Jackson, 2018; Sison & Ferrero, 2015).…”

A Humanistic Narrative for Responsible Management Learning: An Ontological Perspective

“…In fact, the recent rise of mindfulness, yoga, and other spiritually derived practices demonstrate the need for such learning. Mindfulness practices, for example, have been documented to lead to better balance on multiple levels resulting in beneficial health outcomes, productivity increases, and more ethical decision-making (Jackson 2018;Pirson et al 2018).…”