1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.1981.tb00707.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting the Mosaics of S. Sophia at Istanbul

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other historians suggest that the explanation for the replacement head for Zoe may be reuse of an older mosaic, destroyed in the fire of 1043 in Saint Sophia or by supporters of Michael V during Zoe’s exile as a damnatio memoriae . This interpretation has the benefit at least of removing the supposed vanity of the empress and represents an echo of Psellos’ descriptions 11,12 . However, the girly appearance of an older woman, who cared so much for her skin and hair and her total appearance with cosmetics was broadly considered as preparation for sex and consequently was ridiculed by the common opinion of the era (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Other historians suggest that the explanation for the replacement head for Zoe may be reuse of an older mosaic, destroyed in the fire of 1043 in Saint Sophia or by supporters of Michael V during Zoe’s exile as a damnatio memoriae . This interpretation has the benefit at least of removing the supposed vanity of the empress and represents an echo of Psellos’ descriptions 11,12 . However, the girly appearance of an older woman, who cared so much for her skin and hair and her total appearance with cosmetics was broadly considered as preparation for sex and consequently was ridiculed by the common opinion of the era (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Deno John Geanakoplos and Ruth Macrides follow Akropolites in holding that 'the entire day's programme was intended as a thanksgiving to God rather than a celebration of an imperial triumph'. 7 The view that the Deesis mosaic was created in 1261 was established by Robin Cormack, who also contended that the mosaic was accompanied by a suppliant figure of the emperor Michael VIII which no longer survives and that, stylistically, the work probably draws on Italian art of the period, 8 a view which concurs with that of Demus. However, other researchers, such as Alice-Mary Talbot 9 and, with reservations, Cecily Hilsdale, 10 have shown that there is insufficient evidence to support the construction of the Deesis mosaic at this particular date.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%