2001
DOI: 10.1086/321609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting the Cosmic Infrared Background: Constraints on the Evolution of the Dust‐enshrouded Star Formation Rate

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

95
1,789
9

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,111 publications
(1,893 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
95
1,789
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the Silva et al (1998) and Chary & Elbaz (2001) work, Dale et al (2001) present a different model for SEDs in the far-infrared. SEDs are constructed from various dust emission curves and the assumption that there is a power-law distributions of dust masses (thus dust temperatures) over a wide range of radiation fields.…”
Section: Employing Dust Radiative Transfer Models and Empirical Templmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the Silva et al (1998) and Chary & Elbaz (2001) work, Dale et al (2001) present a different model for SEDs in the far-infrared. SEDs are constructed from various dust emission curves and the assumption that there is a power-law distributions of dust masses (thus dust temperatures) over a wide range of radiation fields.…”
Section: Employing Dust Radiative Transfer Models and Empirical Templmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The Chary & Elbaz (2001) and Dale & Helou (2002) have garnered significant traction in the dusty galaxy community for SED fitting, particularly for galaxies detected in the mid-IR for which estimates of far-IR emission are necessary, but newer models have recently become available which make use of more sophisticated, later datasets and modeling techniques specifically tweaked for extreme starbursts. Siebenmorgen & Krügel (2007) describe a spherically symmetric radiative transfer model for dusty starburst nuclei and ULIRGs and argue that the symmetry assumption, and lack of accounting for dust clumpiness, does not significantly change a dusty galaxy's SED.…”
Section: Direct Fir-only Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations