2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting results of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in clinical practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
33
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Distal Vessel FFR CT Values FFR CT provides simultaneous computation of pressure and flow in the entire coronary tree, thus exposing both lesion-specific pressure as well as nadir FFR CT values across the coronary system, which in various settings may drop less than or equal to 0.80 (14,19,(34)(35)(36) (Fig 1). Low terminal vessel FFR CT values (rather than a value distal to stenosis) may include effects unrelated to the stenosis (19,(35)(36)(37). These low values remote from a focal lesion may be due to diffuse CAD or reflect the sum of serial flow-limiting lesions (35)(36)(37).…”
Section: Nørgaard Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Distal Vessel FFR CT Values FFR CT provides simultaneous computation of pressure and flow in the entire coronary tree, thus exposing both lesion-specific pressure as well as nadir FFR CT values across the coronary system, which in various settings may drop less than or equal to 0.80 (14,19,(34)(35)(36) (Fig 1). Low terminal vessel FFR CT values (rather than a value distal to stenosis) may include effects unrelated to the stenosis (19,(35)(36)(37). These low values remote from a focal lesion may be due to diffuse CAD or reflect the sum of serial flow-limiting lesions (35)(36)(37).…”
Section: Nørgaard Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with CAD, as for measured FFR, FFR CT values decline from the ostium to the distal vessel irrespective of the vessel territory, stenosis severity, and location (14,19,(34)(35)(36). In FFR practice, it is advised that the FFR value within the throat of the lesion (which may correspond to the minimum FFR CT value) is not used clinically and that the pressure is assessed at least 2-3 cm distal to the stenosis of interest (20).…”
Section: Standardized Interpretation Of Hemodynamically Significant Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A patient-specific three-dimensional model of the coronary arteries is created after segmentation of the CTA data. Using the above-mentioned mathematical assumptions, a supercomputer performs complex post-processing to solve the equations governing fluid dynamics and blood flow [97,101]. Simulated hyperemic blood flow and pressure data are then generated, and the results are sent back to the referring institution within a few hours (Fig.…”
Section: Technology Of Ct-ffrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2430 Another possibility is the recently developed and validated fluid dynamics based calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from resting cardiac CT images (CT-FFR), 3140 which is rapidly expanding into clinical practice. 41,42 Accordingly, this study was designed to validate resting strain abnormalities as a marker of hemodynamically significant stenosis against two reference standards: a combination of stenosis >50% on CTCA concomitant with an SPD, reflecting together the anatomic severity and the hemodynamic impact of stenosis (reference standard A), 43 and a combination of abnormal CT-FFR with an SPD in the same coronary territory, reflecting the hemodynamic impact in a more robust way than either one of its two components alone (reference standard B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%