1976
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.7.2.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting psychological test results to the hospitalized consumer.

Abstract: Interpreting Psychological Test Results to the Hospitalized ConsumerBecause psychological testing as traditionally used tends to reinforce the message that the patient is "sick," the authors developed an upbeat process that presents testing results to patients in nonjudgmental behavioral terms that provide a comprehensive overview of their problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies of psychological testing practices have primarily focused on the question of what tests are employed (e.g., Fee, Elkins, & Boyd, 1982;Lubin, Wallis, & Paine, 1971;Sundberg, 1961;Wade, Baker, Morton, & Baker, 1978) or on shifts in preference from projective tests to more objective testing (Shemberg & Keeley, 1970;Thelen & Ewing, 1970;Thelen, Varble, & Johnson, 1968). Few articles, however, have dealt with ethical or professional questions pertinent to the practices of psychologists who use these tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies of psychological testing practices have primarily focused on the question of what tests are employed (e.g., Fee, Elkins, & Boyd, 1982;Lubin, Wallis, & Paine, 1971;Sundberg, 1961;Wade, Baker, Morton, & Baker, 1978) or on shifts in preference from projective tests to more objective testing (Shemberg & Keeley, 1970;Thelen & Ewing, 1970;Thelen, Varble, & Johnson, 1968). Few articles, however, have dealt with ethical or professional questions pertinent to the practices of psychologists who use these tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One justification is that assessment instruments may be usefully employed as an adjunctive mode of treatment (e.g., Harrison, 1965;Harrower, 1960). Others (e.g., Ladkin & Levine, 1976) have argued that it is the patient's right to know and that witholding information from the client reinforces the sick role by adding the authority of the psychological battery to the diagnosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authorities have encouraged the sharing of professional files and test results with mental health clients and patients to promote maximum growth and self-responsibility (Brodsky, 1972;Fischer, 1970Fischer, , 1972Goldman, 1972;Ladkin & Levine, 1976;Riscalla, 1972). Clients' access to their own files seems compatible with a wide variety of theoretical approaches including behavioral (Lazarus, 1971;Ullman & Krasner, 1965), general systems (Bertalanffy, 1968), phenomenological (Giorgi, 1970), and client-centered (Rogers, 1951(Rogers, , 1961Rogers & Dymond, 1954) models and those of Carson (1969) and Mischel (1968).…”
Section: Clients' Rights Of Access To Their Filesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open files and test results may be generally consistent with the best interests of the client and society. An open sharing of test results in nonjudgmental, behavioral terms may provide a hospitalized patient and family members important feedback on how their behaviors affect each other (Ladkin & Levine, 1976). Such open sharing of test results may also help with problems of professional jargon (Hallenstein, 1978;Riscalla, 1972).…”
Section: Clients' Rights Of Access To Their Filesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Lazare, Cohen, and Jacobson (1972) and Lazare, Eisenthal, and Wasserman (1975) have proposed "an approach... by which the patient is treated as a customer whose requests are usually legitimate and always a key part of the clinical negotiations" (Lazare et al, 1972, p. 872). A number of writers have suggested a "paradigm change" in assessment that would allow open files and the sharing of test results with patients (Brodsky, 1972;Fischer, 1970Fischer, , 1972Ladkin & Levine, 1970).…”
Section: Some Proposals Toward a Participatory Model Of The Psychothe...mentioning
confidence: 99%