2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0495-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting methamphetamine levels in a high-use community

Abstract: Results from a region with high levels of MA use indicate that MA levels do not differ significantly between weekdays and weekends (p = 0.1), consistent with a predominately regular, daily use pattern use. The potential contribution of legal sales of D: - and L: -MA to the mass of MA consumed within the community was estimated to range from 3-8%. Limitations and uncertainties associated with estimating the mass of MA consumption include small contributions of prescription and over-the-counter drugs that are me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 In the region where this municipality is located, legal use of methamphetamine as a component of prescription medications is estimated to account for only 3–8% of the observed methamphetamine loads. 39 Because the estimated number of methamphetamine doses is lower (270–330; Table 2) than that of caffeine, the number of methamphetamine-containing urine pulses is lower. While one might expect episodic (e.g., multiple peaks of shorter duration) trends in methamphetamine loads, methamphetamine has a longer half–life (9–24 h) than caffeine, 28,64 which may explain why the diurnal trends in methamphetamine are cyclic and not episodic.…”
Section: Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 In the region where this municipality is located, legal use of methamphetamine as a component of prescription medications is estimated to account for only 3–8% of the observed methamphetamine loads. 39 Because the estimated number of methamphetamine doses is lower (270–330; Table 2) than that of caffeine, the number of methamphetamine-containing urine pulses is lower. While one might expect episodic (e.g., multiple peaks of shorter duration) trends in methamphetamine loads, methamphetamine has a longer half–life (9–24 h) than caffeine, 28,64 which may explain why the diurnal trends in methamphetamine are cyclic and not episodic.…”
Section: Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,3537 Methamphetamine is a stimulant that is largely used as an illegal substance 38 with only minor legitimate use in the US. 39 Cocaine is a widely-used illicit stimulant 40 and its major metabolite, benzoylecgonine (BZE), has been used for back-calculating numbers of cocaine doses from wastewater data. 2,3,7,41 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, precaution is required in the interpretation of this data, as it is an exclusive but minor metabolite of heroin and stability in-sample and in-sewer is low (McCall et al, 2016) . High loads of methamphetamine have been reported in Australia (Irvine et al, 2011;Lai et al, 2011), Asia (Khan et al, 2014), North and East of Europe and North America (Banta-Green et al, 2009;Chiaia-Hernandez et al, 2011), but in Colombia methamphetamine and amphetamine were not detected, indicating a limited use of these drugs.…”
Section: Normalization Of Mass Loads and Estimation Of Drug Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been applied in Italy (Zuccato et al, 2005(Zuccato et al, , 2008Castiglioni et al, 2013;Repice et al, 2013), England (Bones et al, 2007;Kasprzyk-Hordern et al, 2009;Baker et al, 2014), Belgium(van Nuijs et al, 2009a;van Nuijs et al, 2011a,b), France (-Karolak et al, 2010), Spain (Postigo et al, 2008;Boleda et al, 2009;Postigo et al, 2010;Martínez Bueno et al, 2011;Andr es-Costa et al, 2014), Norway (Harman et al, 2011;Bramness et al, 2015), Finland (Kankaanp€ a€ a et al, 2014;Vuori et al, 2014), Sweden ), Slovakia(Mackul'ak et al, 2014, Croatia (Terzic et al, 2010), and across Europe (Thomas et al, 2012;Ort et al, 2014). Sewage-based epidemiology was also extensively applied in US (Chiaia et al, 2008;Loganathan et al, 2009;Bartelt-Hunt et al, 2009;Bisceglia et al, 2010;Banta-Green et al, 2009;Chiaia-Hernandez et al, 2011;Brewer et al, 2012;Heuett et al, 2015) and Canada (Metcalfe et al, 2010;Yargeau et al, 2014). In contrast, sewage-based epidemiology studies were scarce in regions other than Europe and North America.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%