2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting Frequency Responses to Dose-Conserved Pulsatile Input Signals in Simple Cell Signaling Motifs

Abstract: Many hormones are released in pulsatile patterns. This pattern can be modified, for instance by changing pulse frequency, to encode relevant physiological information. Often other properties of the pulse pattern will also change with frequency. How do signaling pathways of cells targeted by these hormones respond to different input patterns? In this study, we examine how a given dose of hormone can induce different outputs from the target system, depending on how this dose is distributed in time. We use simple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We just point here that, to our knowledge, none of the biochemically-designed models can distinguish the effect of an increase in the cumulative dose of GnRH from that of a genuine frequency increase ("pure frequency effect" obtained by compensating the frequency for duration and/or amplitude of GnRH pulses). This ascertainment motivated us to study, in a very simplified setup (feedforward signaling motifs), how a given dose of hormone can induce different outputs from the target system, depending on how this dose is distributed in time [22] and we found that nonlinearity in the steady state input-output function of the system predicts the optimal input pattern. Understanding how such input-output functions can be an emergent property of realistic signaling networks remains a totally Beyond their purpose for basic research and mechanistic knowledge, dynamical models can also be used in the context of the HPG axis from the more practical viewpoint of data analysis, and especially for model-based analysis of time series.…”
Section: Further Comments On the Modeling Of The Hpg Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We just point here that, to our knowledge, none of the biochemically-designed models can distinguish the effect of an increase in the cumulative dose of GnRH from that of a genuine frequency increase ("pure frequency effect" obtained by compensating the frequency for duration and/or amplitude of GnRH pulses). This ascertainment motivated us to study, in a very simplified setup (feedforward signaling motifs), how a given dose of hormone can induce different outputs from the target system, depending on how this dose is distributed in time [22] and we found that nonlinearity in the steady state input-output function of the system predicts the optimal input pattern. Understanding how such input-output functions can be an emergent property of realistic signaling networks remains a totally Beyond their purpose for basic research and mechanistic knowledge, dynamical models can also be used in the context of the HPG axis from the more practical viewpoint of data analysis, and especially for model-based analysis of time series.…”
Section: Further Comments On the Modeling Of The Hpg Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sen such that the AUC computed with the PK model, by means of Eq. 27, was preserved (Fletcher et al, 2014). As for intermittent administration, the frequency of the step function amounts to 24 hours, which is split up into a period τ on during which the concentration is fixed at C max PTH,ser , and a period τ off during which the concentration is fixed at C back PTH,ser , with τ on + τ off = 24 h. For defining the actual value of τ on , the requirement was considered that the exact function of C PTH,ser (t) and the corresponding step function must exhibit the same AUC.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pulsatile patterning of GnRH is important not only for the secretion of LH and FSH but also for gene transcription. The effects of GnRH on transcription of LH and FSH display a bell-shaped frequency-response relationship, and a recent model suggests that this frequency decoding arises from the interplay of two transcription factors that interact co-operatively, -a phenomenon that may commonly arise as an emergent feature of signalling networks , 60, [99,100].…”
Section: An Alternative Model Of the Ovarian Cycle That Does Not Invomentioning
confidence: 99%