2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting canonical tensor model in minisuperspace

Abstract: Canonical tensor model is a theory of dynamical fuzzy spaces in arbitrary space-time dimensions. Examining its simplest case, we find a connection to a minisuperspace model of general relativity in arbitrary dimensions. This is a first step in interpreting variables in canonical tensor model based on the known language of general relativity.Comment: 9 page

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental dynamical variables of the model are a conjugate pair of real symmetric rank-3 tensors. The CTM has been shown to have a strong connection to general relativity: It agrees with a mini-superspace approximation for N = 1 [18], 3 while in a formal continuum limit, where N → ∞, the dynamical structure agrees with that of general relativity [19,20]. Due to this connection with general relativity and the fact that the model can be quantized easily [21], one can hope for this model to be a consistent model for quantum gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fundamental dynamical variables of the model are a conjugate pair of real symmetric rank-3 tensors. The CTM has been shown to have a strong connection to general relativity: It agrees with a mini-superspace approximation for N = 1 [18], 3 while in a formal continuum limit, where N → ∞, the dynamical structure agrees with that of general relativity [19,20]. Due to this connection with general relativity and the fact that the model can be quantized easily [21], one can hope for this model to be a consistent model for quantum gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, the solution is more non-trivial than (17) in the P representation, which is a solution to the first order ones. Unfortunately, we do not presently have any generalization of this solution to λ = 0.13 λ corresponds to the cosmological constant in the correspondence between the CTM with N = 1 and the minisuperspace treatment of general relativity[18]. Therefore, the necessity of λ > 0 is curiously matching the present astrophysical observation of a positive cosmological constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In six dimensions, de Sitter spacetime becomes a solution to the EOM, signaling the emergence of a conformal symmetry, while the time evolution of the scale factor is power-law in dimensions below six.1 See, however,[4,5,6] for a matrix-model-like approach to three-dimensional quantum gravity. 2 When coupling many U(1)-fields, the authors in [12] found a promise of a phase transition higher than first order, which, however, is in conflict with the result in [13].3 As well, a certain minisuperspace model of GR can be derived from CTM [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for its relation to general relativity, the following properties have been shown. (i) In the simplest case 4 , CTM classically agrees with the mini-superspace approximation of general relativity [20]. (ii) In a formal continuum limit with N → ∞, the algebraic structure of the constraints of CTM agrees with that of the ADM formalism [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The familiar notation would be more appropriate, because the conjugate pair appears symmetrically in the new formulation. 6 In [20], this parameter plays the role of the cosmological constant in the mini-superspace approximation of general relativity. where t is a time variable.…”
Section: Review Of Ctmmentioning
confidence: 99%