2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90177-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting and using the Dietary References Intakes in dietary assessment of individuals and groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
68
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The EAR is the nutrient intake value estimated to meet the requirement of 50% of individuals in life-stage and gender groups (Barr et al, 2002). The EAR is the most appropriate comparison standard for assessing nutrient intakes of groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EAR is the nutrient intake value estimated to meet the requirement of 50% of individuals in life-stage and gender groups (Barr et al, 2002). The EAR is the most appropriate comparison standard for assessing nutrient intakes of groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the broad context of interpretation of Dietary References Intakes (DRIs), the RDA -the daily intake that is considered sufficient to meet the needs of almost all (97.5%) of the healthy persons in a population -is not used to assess intakes of groups. For the latter, the use of the EAR -the daily intake that is considered sufficient to meet the needs of 50% of the healthy persons in a population -is recommended (Food andNutrition Board, 1994, 2000;Barr et al, 2002). However, such data are not available for Belgium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the FFQ was based on values from the Canadian Nutrient File version 2010 and the US Department of Agriculture National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. 25,26 The categorization of nutritional intake was conducted according to the latest dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. 18 Because a nutrient intake <67% of the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) should be improved, 27 intakes for calcium and vitamin D were compared with their respective RDA for age and considered inadequate if they failed to meet 67% of this value. Among participants taking calcium and vitamin D supplementation, compliance was evaluated by establishing the frequency of supplementation over a 1-week period.…”
Section: Calcium and Vitamin D Intakesmentioning
confidence: 99%