2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretations on how the macroscopic mechanical behavior of sandstone affected by microscopic properties—Revealed by bonded-particle model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that to present a unified normalized UCS relationship for different rocks with different strength, it is common to use normalized strain rate (dynamic strain rate/reference strain rate) to define the relationship for normalized UCS ( σudin/σusin). In the current study, the reference strain rate ε r is equivalent to the quasi‐static strain rate of the rocks, which is consistent with previous studies . Based on the results shown in Figure , it was found that the strain rate has a very limited effect on UCS when it is below 0.1 s −1 .…”
Section: Simulation Methodology: Bpmsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Note that to present a unified normalized UCS relationship for different rocks with different strength, it is common to use normalized strain rate (dynamic strain rate/reference strain rate) to define the relationship for normalized UCS ( σudin/σusin). In the current study, the reference strain rate ε r is equivalent to the quasi‐static strain rate of the rocks, which is consistent with previous studies . Based on the results shown in Figure , it was found that the strain rate has a very limited effect on UCS when it is below 0.1 s −1 .…”
Section: Simulation Methodology: Bpmsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For this reason, a significant amount of previous research has been devoted to correlating unconfined compressive strength of sandstones with their index engineering properties, such as density, absorption, moisture content, porosity, and pore size distribution (Hoshino, 1974;Shakoor and Bonelli, 1991;Hawkins and McConnell, 1992;Haney and Shakoor, 1994;Ulusay et al, 1994;Palchick, 1999;and Hale and Shakoor, 2003), as well as with their reaction to such climatic changes as heating and cooling, wetting and drying, and freezing and thawing (Colback and Wiid, 1965;D'Andrea et al, 1965;Broch, 1974;Michalopoulos and Triandafilidis, 1976;Venkatappa Rao et al, 1985;and Bell, 1992). The effect of petrographic characteristics (grain size, grain shape, nature of grain-to-grain contacts, amount and type of matrix) on unconfined compressive strength of sandstones has also been studied extensively by various researchers (Fahy and Guccione, 1979;Winkler, 1986;Singh, 1988;Shakoor and Bonelli, 1991;Haney and Shakoor, 1994;Ulusay et al, 1994;Hale and Shakoor, 2003;and Hsieh et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The values of the global DEM parameters can be found using different procedures. Some authors [4,6,7] have used numerical experiments for determining the relationships between DEM and continuum parameters expressed in dimensionless form. This method has been used by the authors in previous works [9][10][11][12][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Background On the Demmentioning
confidence: 99%