1970
DOI: 10.13182/nt70-a28806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretations of Fission Gas Behavior in Refractory Fuels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matke shows that this would result in about 9% swelling per year in UC [9], and this is what is used for the swelling analyses. However, this may be an underestimate because according to Ritzman [10], these parameters could lead UC to swell 14% a year. Fuel swelling data is even less extensive for UN, but nitrides tend to show less swelling than carbides [11].…”
Section: Fission Gas Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matke shows that this would result in about 9% swelling per year in UC [9], and this is what is used for the swelling analyses. However, this may be an underestimate because according to Ritzman [10], these parameters could lead UC to swell 14% a year. Fuel swelling data is even less extensive for UN, but nitrides tend to show less swelling than carbides [11].…”
Section: Fission Gas Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matke shows that this criteria would result in about 9% swelling per year in UC (Matzke 1986), and this is what is used for the swelling analyses. However, this may be an underestimate because according to Ritzman (1970), these parameters could lead UC to swell 14% a year. Fuel swelling data is even less extensive for UN, but nitrides tend to show less swelling than carbides (Matzke 1986).…”
Section: 332mentioning
confidence: 99%