2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12371-016-0197-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation Possibilites of Geoheritage in Southeastern Serbia—Gorge and Canyon Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In some related parks and other areas, geotourism is being used to promote geoheritage. They include the geologic park of Aliaga, Spain (Escorihuela and Dowling, 2015); the US Fossil Parks (Clary and Wandersee, 2014); Sheringham Park, England (Daniels and Veale, 2015); a region in southeastern Serbia (Began et al, 2017); and in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador (Kelley and Salazar, 2017). Many regions have also been assessed for their potential for geotourism.…”
Section: A Growing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some related parks and other areas, geotourism is being used to promote geoheritage. They include the geologic park of Aliaga, Spain (Escorihuela and Dowling, 2015); the US Fossil Parks (Clary and Wandersee, 2014); Sheringham Park, England (Daniels and Veale, 2015); a region in southeastern Serbia (Began et al, 2017); and in the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador (Kelley and Salazar, 2017). Many regions have also been assessed for their potential for geotourism.…”
Section: A Growing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is illustrated in the many chapters of this book. Specific regions and/or countries where geotourism has been proposed include the Almeria Province, southeast Spain (Hose, 2007); Hawaii, USA (King, 2010); The Sultanate of Oman (Lawrence, 2010); Mt Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia (Tongkul, 2010); Mauritius (Johnson et al, 2010); the Kutch region, Gujarat, India (Swarna et al, 2013); the Lubelskie Province, southeastern Poland (Zgłobicki and Baran-Zgłobicka, 2013); China (Zhang et al, 2013); Malaysia (Ghani et al, 2013); Iceland (Ólafsdóttir and Dowling, 2014); the Idanre Hills, Nigeria (Anifowose and Kolawole, 2014); Western Australia (Pforr and Dowling, 2008;Pforr et al, 2014); in eight Chinese geoparks (Ng, 2015); Philippines (Aquino et al, 2017); Zonguldak, Turkey (Citiroglu et al, 2017); Waldviertel, Austria (Migoń, Różycka and Michniewicz, 2017); Serbia (Began et al, 2017), Australia and New Zealand (Dowling and Pforr, 2017) and in southern Egypt (Sallam et al, 2018). Community attitudes to geotourism development have been examined in Iran (Shahhoseini et al, 2017) and Poland (Różycka and Migoń, 2018).…”
Section: A Growing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geotourism is now being used as a vehicle to foster sustainable tourism development in a number of regions around the world, for example, in China (Zhang et al, 2013), Malaysia (Ghani, Leman, & Komoo, 2013), Philippines (Aquino, Schänzel, & Hyde, 2017), Turkey (Citiroglu, Isik, & Pulat, 2017), and Serbia (Began et al, 2017).…”
Section: Overview Of Geotourismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this problem can be fixed with professional interpretations of the geological information (guided excursions, specially installed panels and kiosks, interactive and virtual tools, etc.) [13,[21][22][23][24][25], the relevant solutions limit carrying capacity of geo-tourist attractions and require additional costs for geo-tourism resource exploitation. Moreover, tourists can be better satisfied from visits to geo-parks, offering easier-to-understand geo-heritage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%