1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02442692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of venous occlusion plethysmography using a nonlinear model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The arm volume was calculated using the larger (below the elbow region) and smaller (at the wrist) arm circumferences. This procedure has been described previously to estimate lower limb volume (Anderson et al 1986).…”
Section: The Proposed Vop Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The arm volume was calculated using the larger (below the elbow region) and smaller (at the wrist) arm circumferences. This procedure has been described previously to estimate lower limb volume (Anderson et al 1986).…”
Section: The Proposed Vop Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model considered that hydraulic resistance to the forearm venous blood flow is mainly originated by basilic and cephalic veins, which are in parallel association. Considering that these veins have similar resistance values and diameter of approximately 2.9 cm (cephalic vein value referred on Eiken and Kölegard 2004) and a length of about 20 cm (leg deep veins value presented on Anderson et al 1986) and a blood viscosity of 2.63 × 10 −5 mmHg s (Hoeks et al 1995), the estimated R V was 1.5 mmHg s/ml.…”
Section: Arteriolar and Venous Resistancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While invasive methods for DVT detection such as venography are most accurate, they could cause some risk to the patient. As a result there has been many studies on non-invasive techniques, including venous occlusion plethysmography(VOP), to screen patients for the presence of DVT [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While invasive methods for DVT detection such as venography are most accurate, they could cause some risk to the patient. As a result there has been many studies on non-invasive techniques, including venous occlusion plethysmography(VOP), to screen patients for the presence of DVT [1][2][3].Although the results of VOP are helpful to detect DVT, being an indirect measure, there are difficulties in quantitative comparison of results that come from different degrees of thrombosis. So, there has been a study which estimates the effects of thrombosis size on patient's venous outflow with a numerical model [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%