2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00151.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Transmissivity Estimates from Single‐Well Pumping Aquifer Tests

Abstract: Interpretation of single-well tests with the Cooper-Jacob method remains more reasonable than most alternatives. Drawdowns from 628 simulated single-well tests where transmissivity was specified were interpreted with the Cooper-Jacob straight-line method to estimate transmissivity. Error and bias as a function of vertical anisotropy, partial penetration, specific yield, and interpretive technique were investigated for transmissivities that ranged from 10 to 10,000 m(2)/d. Cooper-Jacob transmissivity estimates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have insufficient information to resolve the potential influence of the first of these parameters, but variations in apparent formation transmissivity and permeability with depth, shown later, suggest that there is heterogeneous layering of the crust around Hole 1301B. Particularly within highly transmissive formations, partial penetration generally has a modest influence on transmissivity values inferred from single‐hole tests [ Halford et al , 2006]. The issue of aquifer anisotropy is addressed in a related study [ Fisher et al , 2008].…”
Section: Experimental Operations and Data Processing And Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have insufficient information to resolve the potential influence of the first of these parameters, but variations in apparent formation transmissivity and permeability with depth, shown later, suggest that there is heterogeneous layering of the crust around Hole 1301B. Particularly within highly transmissive formations, partial penetration generally has a modest influence on transmissivity values inferred from single‐hole tests [ Halford et al , 2006]. The issue of aquifer anisotropy is addressed in a related study [ Fisher et al , 2008].…”
Section: Experimental Operations and Data Processing And Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams and Soroos (1973) assessed the suitability of a few aquifer tests with observation wells using traditional methods on Hawaii volcanic aquifers. Halford et al (2006) found that hydraulic conductivity is better estimated with aquifer thickness rather than screen length in the case of partially penetrating wells in unconfined aquifers. Halford et al (2006) found that hydraulic conductivity is better estimated with aquifer thickness rather than screen length in the case of partially penetrating wells in unconfined aquifers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, the drawdown was low indicating that pumping can be sustained and that aquifers can recuperate as reported by [18]. The maximum and minimum sustainable yields recorded are 380 m 3 /day and 50 m 3 /day (Table 3).…”
Section: Sustainable Yield and Transmissivitymentioning
confidence: 74%