“…For a quasistructural molecule, all of the following should hold (to a greater or lesser extent) at the same time: (a) consideration of a single minimum on the PES, even though the molecule may possess only one minimum determinable by methods of electronic‐structure theory (this is the case, for example, for the quasistructural H and CH molecular cations treated in detail below), is insufficient to interpret the structure and the dynamical behavior of the molecule and its observable (high‐resolution) spectra, (b) when the structure is averaged, principally over the vibrational ground state(s), it may be significantly (i.e., even qualitatively) different from the equilibrium BO one (“quasistructurality” manifests itself in the effective structure of the molecule, whereby the equilibrium and the ground‐state rotational constants may become drastically different), due to strongly anharmonic zero‐point motions and the significant occupancy of low‐energy (ro)vibrational states, (c) rotational and vibrational spacings are of the same order of magnitude (this is most easily satisfied for light, H‐containing molecules) and the internal nuclear dynamics is thus exceedingly complex, (d) spectroscopic characterization of the molecule must rely on MS groups involving permutation and inversion symmetry operations and feasible and unfeasible motions in the Longuet‐Higgins sense, and (e) the set of assigned rovibrational energies of the molecule exhibits unconventional (in the most striking cases “negative”) rotational‐energy contributions (this is one of the most clear signs of quasistructural behavior). Note right away that (1) case (b) can happen for molecules considered to be semirigid, and (2) in a few publications we called quasistructural molecules “astructural.” Nevertheless, we now believe that the new terminology proposed here should replace the old one. A feasible alternative would be to greatly extend the IUPAC definition of “fluxional molecules.”…”