1953
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(53)90325-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of the velocity measurement ballistocardiogram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ballistocardiography (BCG), originally discovered in the late 19 th century [1], has been the focus of intense research in 1940’s through the early 80’s, a period after which the method faded away (see Figure 1). This disappearance can be traced to a few general factors: 1) a lack of standard measurement techniques, with various methods leading to subtly different signals [2]; 2) a lack of understanding of the exact physiologic origin of the BCG waveform, as well as clear guidelines for interpretation of the results, leading to circumspection from the medical community; 3) a primary focus on clinical diagnostic (e.g., myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary heart disease [3, 4]), which typically requires a high level of specificity and reliability that the BCG had not reached [5]; 4) the dawn of ultrasound and echocardiography techniques, which rapidly overtook BCG and related techniques for non-invasive cardiac and hemodynamic diagnostic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballistocardiography (BCG), originally discovered in the late 19 th century [1], has been the focus of intense research in 1940’s through the early 80’s, a period after which the method faded away (see Figure 1). This disappearance can be traced to a few general factors: 1) a lack of standard measurement techniques, with various methods leading to subtly different signals [2]; 2) a lack of understanding of the exact physiologic origin of the BCG waveform, as well as clear guidelines for interpretation of the results, leading to circumspection from the medical community; 3) a primary focus on clinical diagnostic (e.g., myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary heart disease [3, 4]), which typically requires a high level of specificity and reliability that the BCG had not reached [5]; 4) the dawn of ultrasound and echocardiography techniques, which rapidly overtook BCG and related techniques for non-invasive cardiac and hemodynamic diagnostic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%