Interpretation of the optical rotatory dispersion in tellurium

Vyšín, Ivo; Sváčková, Kamila; Řı́ha, Jan

doi:10.1107/s0021889801017800

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(7 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The induced electric and magnetic dipole moments of the volume unit can be evaluated by substituting these results back into the relations (10). The dipole moments are then…”

Section: Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been proved that use of more complicated variants of the method of coupled oscillators, which better correspond to the crystal structure than the basic model of two oscillators, enables better description of the ORD. This can be demonstrated on the example of the ORD of tellurium or benzil [10][11][12]. It is possible to say that the use of the model of coupled oscillators in the crystalline OA is one of the fundamental solution approaches to this problem [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Note on the solutions of the model of coupled oscillators in crystalline optical activity for the direction perpendicular to the optic axis

Vyšín

Baránek

Řı́ha

2011

J. Opt.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the past, Chandrasekhar’s method of two coupled oscillators was successfully used for the interpretation of crystalline optical activity. The optical activity dispersion relations were obtained in the direction of the optic axis and also in the direction perpendicular to the optic axis. However, Chandrasekhar’s approach to the solution method is based on a mistake in his calculations. This mistake does not influence the character of the dispersion relations in the direction of the optic axis, which was proved by the solution of the model of coupled oscillators using the Condon relations. Similar conclusions have not been introduced for the direction perpendicular to the optic axis. For that reason, the model of coupled oscillators, using the Condon relations, is presented also for the direction perpendicular to the optic axis. The considered model of coupled oscillators is more complicated and therefore corresponds to the structure of real crystals more closely. It can be proved that, in spite of Chandrasekhar’s mistake in the calculations, his conclusions hold. The character of the dispersion relations in the directions parallel and perpendicular to the optic axis is the same and differs only by a constant multiplicative factor. However, Chandrasekhar’s factor differs from the derived form of this factor, which is presented in this paper. It is also presented for the example of an atomic crystal of tellurium that the form of Chandrasekhar’s factor is incorrect. The mistakes in Chandrasekhar’s derivations are also discussed.

show abstract

“…The induced electric and magnetic dipole moments of the volume unit can be evaluated by substituting these results back into the relations (10). The dipole moments are then…”

Section: Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%