Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com high pedestal where it belongs.Any clinical physician of any specialty who deals with clinical conditions and therapeutic decision-making in the ambulatory or hospital setting should have sufficient ECG knowledge to properly make an accurate diagnosis of a heart condition. Adequate knowledge should include the ability to interpret, define, recognize, and understand the basic pathophysiology of certain electrocardiographic abnormalities or patterns [6][7][8][9].For these reasons it is very interesting the paper published by Javier Higueras in this issue of this journal [10]. The authors evaluated the accuracy in the interpretation of electrocardiograms among residents and staff doctors and compared the usefulness of an intensive training course in ECG with a standard rotation in cardiology unit. They found that real ECG knowledge between doctors is poor [10]. The overall accuracy of ECG interpretation was low for both resident and staff physicians. This finding is worrisome and of particular interest given the fact that the ECGs were chosen as examples of diseases or conditions that any physician should have been able to recognize and properly diagnose. Residents obtained better results than staff at the beginning but at the end there were not statistic differences. Intensive courses were similar to classical teaching method [10]. These results demonstrate that very little is known about ECG interpretative skills of medical residents [10][11][12]. Moreover, many doctors are unaware of their limitations and believe that their ECG interpretation knowledge is good enough. However, several studies showed otherwise [13][14][15][16][17]. The results of these investigations highlight the fact that the current ECG interpretation knowledge is undoubtedly poor.There are some attenuating causes that mitigate and could be responsible of these poor results. As the authors explained, no clinical information or automatic interpretation of ECG machine was provided to the physicians in order to avoid influencing the participant's interpretation of the ECG. Previous research has demonstrated a strong and consistent effect of clinical scenario on the accuracy of ECG interpretation and proper identification of heart conditions and ECG parameters by physicians at all levels of training, but especially for medical doctors with less experience [18][19][20][21].About a decade ago, we perform an ECG investigation to define the incidence of physicians in the different disciplines of medicine who can recognize a long QT interval when they see one [21]. Since little was known about the abilities of physicians to make such determination, we conducted the study to determine the percentage of physicians in different fields of medicine who can accurately measure the QT interval, calculate the QTc (the QT interval corrected for the heart rate), and identify a long QT interval. We presented the ECGs of two patients with Long QT Syndrome and two healthy females to 902 physicians (25 world-renowned QT e...