Interpretation of the dosimetric results of three uniformity regularization methods in terms of expected treatment outcome

Abstract

In IMRT treatment plan optimization there are various methods that try to regularize the variation of dose nonuniformity using purely dosimetric measures. However, although these methods can help in finding a good dose distribution, they do not provide any information regarding the expected treatment outcome. When a treatment plan optimization is performed using biological measures, the final goal should be some indication about the expected tumor control or normal tissue complications, which is the primary goal of treatment planning (the association of treatment configurations and dose prescription with the treatment outcome). In this study, this issue is analyzed distinguishing the dose-oriented treatment plan optimization from the response-oriented optimization. Three different dose distributions were obtained by using a dose-based optimization technique, an EUD-based optimization without applying any technique for regularizing the nonuniformity of the dose distribution, and an EUD-based optimization using a variational regularization technique, which controls dose nonuniformity. The clinical effectiveness of the three dose distributions was investigated by calculating the response probabilities of the tumors and organs-at-risk (OARs) involved in two head and neck and prostate cancer cases. The radiobiological models used are the linear-quadratic-Poisson and the Relative Seriality models. Furthermore, the complication-free tumor control probability and the biologically effective uniform dose (D) were used for treatment plan evaluation and comparison. The radiobiological comparison shows that the EUD-based optimization using L-curve regularization gives better results than the EUD-based optimization without regularization and dose-based optimization in both clinical cases. Concluding, it appears that the applied dose nonuniformity regularization technique is expected to improve the effectiveness of the optimized IMRT dose distributions. However, more patient cases are needed to validate the statistical significance of the results and conclusions presented in this paper.

Biology Contributions Radiobiological evaluation of the influence of dwell time modulation restriction in HIPO optimized HDR prostate brachytherapy implants

“…All the inverse optimized treatment plans were based on HIPO using the modulation restriction methods, which are investigated in conjunction with radiobiological dose non-uniformity evaluation measures in order to estimate their expected clinical impact [13]. A certain pattern of dose non-uniformities produces a certain radiobiological response.…”

A gEUD‐based inverse planning technique for HDR prostate brachytherapy: Feasibility study

“…Furthermore, in order to more closely predict the clinical outcome of a treatment, the tumor control probability (TCP), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and uncomplicated tumor control probability (P + ), which depend on radiobiological parameters, have also been used for plan evaluation both in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy. [21][22][23][24] In various cases they have also been used as an alternative or in conjunction with dose-volume-based criteria during the treatment plan optimization procedure [25][26][27] and the significance of doseresponse-based objective functions has been suggested for intensity modulated (external) radiation therapy (IMRT) in several papers. [28][29][30][31] In most of the cases it was shown that for the same or better target coverage dose-response-based optimization resulted in improved sparing of critical structures.…”

Design and research on impact resistance characteristics of vector hydrophone application platform

“…The time-domain waveform of half sine pulse signal.According to the kinetic law, the dynamic equation of the hydrophone m is as follows[4] mx cx kx ky cy +…”