2014
DOI: 10.7589/2014-05-138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Plasma Selenium Data in Huemul: Response to Flueck et al

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative interpretation [ 23 ] of the first-ever study on Se status in huemul from RNLC related to the conclusion by Chihuailaf et al [ 22 ] that “Se values were within the interval reported for white-tailed deer”, and that Se concentrations from huemul were “within reference intervals calculated for other deer”, referring to the study by [ 24 ]. However, the review by [ 24 ] was not based on data from deer “in one area” as asserted by Chihuailaf and Corti [ 44 ], but provided results from 8 different populations with means differing by up to 542%. These results certainly cannot serve as reference intervals, but mainly because [ 24 ] mentioned deer and livestock in their study areas as having been diagnosed with white muscle disease, and 50% of the deer were severely deficient and 75% had less than the critical concentration by livestock standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The alternative interpretation [ 23 ] of the first-ever study on Se status in huemul from RNLC related to the conclusion by Chihuailaf et al [ 22 ] that “Se values were within the interval reported for white-tailed deer”, and that Se concentrations from huemul were “within reference intervals calculated for other deer”, referring to the study by [ 24 ]. However, the review by [ 24 ] was not based on data from deer “in one area” as asserted by Chihuailaf and Corti [ 44 ], but provided results from 8 different populations with means differing by up to 542%. These results certainly cannot serve as reference intervals, but mainly because [ 24 ] mentioned deer and livestock in their study areas as having been diagnosed with white muscle disease, and 50% of the deer were severely deficient and 75% had less than the critical concentration by livestock standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, we questioned the removal of 36% of data points from the analysis by [ 22 ], based on the claim that these were outliers. In response, Chihuailaf and Corti [ 44 ] only mention that Friedrichs et al [ 45 ] suggest the removal of outliers to minimize error when establishing reference intervals. However, according to Friedrichs et al definition of outliers we must ask: were these eliminated data points considered not to belong to the underlying distribution of the overall data set?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations