2022
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.849079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Magnetic Anomalies by Simple Geometrical Structures Using the Manta-Ray Foraging Optimization

Abstract: In this paper, a geophysical strategy based on the recently proposed Manta-Ray Foraging (MRF) Optimization algorithm is adapted and presented for the blind computation of depth/shape defining parameters from magnetic anomalies due to buried geo-bodies. The model parameters deciphered are the coefficient of amplitude (K), buried structure’s origin (x0), the depth (z), magnetization angle (α), and a shape factor (q). After detailed and piecewise design, the new inversion tool is originally trial-tested on anomal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These techniques are suitable for delineating isolated/multiple magnetic source geometries and vertical contact, as well as magnetic susceptibility disparity (Telford et al, 1990). Magnetic technique is a potential tool that can be applied in the evaluation of the lateral extent of several high temperature geothermal sources in young volcanic rocks (Ben et al, 2022a;. To ensure various geothermal anomalies are well mapped, the magnetic data of investigated area were sectioned into 61 spectral blocks with 50% overlay of each block.…”
Section: Airborne Magnetic Data Have Been Qualitativelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques are suitable for delineating isolated/multiple magnetic source geometries and vertical contact, as well as magnetic susceptibility disparity (Telford et al, 1990). Magnetic technique is a potential tool that can be applied in the evaluation of the lateral extent of several high temperature geothermal sources in young volcanic rocks (Ben et al, 2022a;. To ensure various geothermal anomalies are well mapped, the magnetic data of investigated area were sectioned into 61 spectral blocks with 50% overlay of each block.…”
Section: Airborne Magnetic Data Have Been Qualitativelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the well‐known ill‐posedness and non‐uniqueness nature of the geomagnetic data inversion problem, explanation of anomaly sources, that is, model parameter estimations, necessitate some special strategies and efficient approaches (Ekinci et al., 2019). Over the recent years, instead of derivative‐based local optimizers, derivative‐free nature‐inspired global optimizers and metaheuristics such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) (Essa, Abo‐Ezz, et al., 2022; Essa & Elhussein, 2020; Fernández‐Martínez et al., 2010; Pallero et al., 2015; Roy et al., 2022; Santos, 2010), Very Fast Simulated Annealing (VFSA) (Biswas, 2016; Biswas & Acharya, 2016; Biswas & Rao, 2021), Ant Colony Optimization (Liu et al., 2014, 2015; Srivastava et al., 2014); Gray Wolf Optimizer (Agarwal et al., 2018; Chandra et al., 2017), Genetic‐Price Algorithm (Di Maio et al., 2020), Cuckoo Search Algorithm (Turan‐Karaoğlan & Göktürkler, 2021), Differential Search Algorithm (Alkan & Balkaya, 2018; A. Balkaya & Kaftan, 2021; Özyalın & Sındırgı, 2023), Bat Algorithm (Essa & Diab, 2022; Gobashy et al., 2021), Differential Evolution Algorithm (Ç. Balkaya, 2013; Du et al., 2021; Ekinci, Balkaya, & Göktürkler, 2020; Ekinci et al., 2023; Göktürkler et al., 2016; Hosseinzadeh et al., 2023; Roy et al., 2021a; Sungkono, 2020); Backtracking Search Algorithm (Ekinci, Balkaya, & Göktürkler, 2021), Manta‐Ray Foraging Optimization and Social Spider Optimization (Ben et al., 2022a, 2022b, 2022c), Barnacles Mating Optimization (BMO) (Ai et al., 2022) have gained increasing attention in geophysical inversion applications. Unlike local search algorithms, these stochastic optimizers do not need a well‐designed starting point in the model space to reach the global minimum (Sen & Stoffa, 2013; Tarantola, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balkaya & Kaftan, 2021;Özyalın & Sındırgı, 2023), Bat Algorithm (Essa & Diab, 2022;Gobashy et al, 2021), Differential Evolution Algorithm (Ç. Balkaya, 2013;Du et al, 2021;Ekinci, Balkaya, & Göktürkler, 2020;Ekinci et al, 2023;Göktürkler et al, 2016;Hosseinzadeh et al, 2023;Roy et al, 2021a;Sungkono, 2020); Backtracking Search Algorithm , Manta-Ray Foraging Optimization and Social Spider Optimization (Ben et al, 2022a(Ben et al, , 2022b(Ben et al, , 2022c, Barnacles Mating Optimization (BMO) (Ai et al, 2022) have gained increasing attention in geophysical inversion applications. Unlike local search algorithms, these stochastic optimizers do not need a well-designed starting point in the model space to reach the global minimum (Sen & Stoffa, 2013;Tarantola, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b. Remarkably, nature-inspired derivative-free metaheuristic algorithms have been effectively applied with proper modifications, including particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE), differential search (DS), simulated-annealing (SA), ant-colony optimization (ACO), gravitational search algorithm (GSA), bat algorithm (BA), manta-ray foraging (MRF) optimization (Balkaya et [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] [15] [53,54] . However, in general, the correctness and accuracy of the results obtained by the aforementioned interpretation techniques depend on the precision by which the anomaly of the source structure/s is extracted from the entire measured information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%