Interpretation of Immiscible WAG Repeat Pressure Fall-Off Tests

Abstract

This paper reviewed the interpretation of repeat fall-off tests acquired in two vertical pattern injectors operating in a carbonate reservoir undergoing full field development. Water Alternating Gas first pattern (WAG-1) started in August 2002 with a period of continuous gas injection until 2006 when the first water cycle was initiated. In the second pattern (WAG-2) water injection was initiated in June 1998 until September 2007 when the first gas cycle started.A few pressure fall-off tests were acquired during the monophasic injection phase mostly to verify well injectivity. After Water Alternating Gas (WAG) cycles started, pressure fall-off tests were usually acquired at the end of each three-month injection cycle with 1:1 WAG ratio. Analytical fall-off test interpretation relied on the use of the two-zone radial composite model. The apparent permeability thickness product was corrected with the Perrine formulation of multiphase mobility. Triphasic oil permeability was calculated using the modified Stone I model. Multiple fall-off test interpretations indicated that the two pattern vertical injectors behaved differently even though both being fractured. The difference in behavior was linked to different perforated intervals and reservoir properties. Gas and water injection rates were showing differences between both pattern injectors as a consequence. No major operational issue was reported during the three-year operation of both WAG patterns. During the WAG cycles, gas banks were found to be of a small inner radius and almost undetectable at the end of the subsequent water cycle. Changes in the pressure derivative slope at the end of the subsequent water injection cycle indicated most likely the creation of an effective mixing zone of injected gas and water in the reservoir.Numerical finite-volume simulation was required to account for potential injected fluid segregation and, the multi-layered and heterogeneous nature of the reservoir. Repeat saturation logs acquired in observation wells provided critical information on the saturation distribution away from the injection wells. Enhanced vertical sweep conformance through phase mobility control in the presence of strong reservoir heterogeneity was the major expected benefit from an immiscible WAG displacement mechanism. All available observations were reviewed and integrated using a history-matched reservoir simulation sector model with boundary conditions obtained from a full-field model.