2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of ground surface changes prior to the 2010 large eruption of Merapi volcano using ALOS/PALSAR, ASTER TIR and gas emission data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using IASI measurements from 1000 to 1200 cm −1 and from 1300 to 1410 cm −1 , an optimal estimation retrieval (Rodgers, 2000) is employed to estimate the SO 2 column amount, the height and spread of the SO 2 profile, and the surface skin temperature.…”
Section: So 2 Retrieval Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using IASI measurements from 1000 to 1200 cm −1 and from 1300 to 1410 cm −1 , an optimal estimation retrieval (Rodgers, 2000) is employed to estimate the SO 2 column amount, the height and spread of the SO 2 profile, and the surface skin temperature.…”
Section: So 2 Retrieval Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing has been largely applied to characterize the deposits of the 2010 Merapi eruption, either based on optical data Komorowski et al, 2013;Solikhin et al, in revision) or SAR images using X-band (Bignami et al, 2013) or L-band (Saepuloh et al, 2013;Yulianto, Sofan, Khomarudin, & Haidar, 2013). As SAR images can be used to track lava extrusion and dome growth at highly explosive andesitic volcanoes, they were essential for managing the 2010 eruptive crisis of Merapi (Pallister et al, 2013).…”
Section: Case Study: the 2010 Merapi Pyroclastic Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this eruption, the summit crater expanded from 0.048 km 2 (on 1 November 2010) to 0.093 km 2 (on 1 February 2011), which is similar to the result based on optical satellite images (0.11 km 2 ; Solikhin et al, in revision). Crater expansion was also followed by geomorphological changes of the dome surface, from an area of 0.0135 km 2 on 1 November 2010 to 0.0432 km 2 on 1 February 2011 (Saepuloh et al, 2013).…”
Section: Ratio Of Amplitude Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At explosive domebuilding volcanoes, the location of the conduit is more difficult to constrain. In some cases, we can observe summit deformation caused by the pre-eruptive intrusion of magma to very shallow levels of the volcano (Dzurisin et al, 2008;Saepuloh et al, 2013). Since the newly injected material remains there, this deformation is static and lacks co-explosive subsidence (Ratdomopurbo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%