2008
DOI: 10.1029/2007jd009390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of gravity wave signatures in GPS radio occultations

Abstract: The horizontal averaging of global positioning system radio occultation retrievals produces an amplitude attenuation and phase shift in any plane gravity wave, which may lead to significant discrepancies with respect to the original values. In addition, wavelengths cannot be straightforwardly inferred due to the observational characteristics. If the waves produce small departures from spherical symmetry in the background atmosphere and under the assumption that the refractivity kernel may be represented by a d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that dominant wavelengths are found around 3 km, whereas the shape for amplitude is very similar to what has already been equivalently observed for potential energy by Baumgaertner and McDonald (2007). It must be stated that detected and real vertical wavelengths must be distinguished for non-vertical sounding trajectories like GPS RO, whereby the discrepancy depends on the angle defined by the LOS and the wave constant phase surfaces (e.g., Alexander et al, 2008). The deviation may be significant for mountain waves, as their phase surfaces generally differ from the local horizontal plane.…”
Section: Amplitude and Wavelength Distributionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that dominant wavelengths are found around 3 km, whereas the shape for amplitude is very similar to what has already been equivalently observed for potential energy by Baumgaertner and McDonald (2007). It must be stated that detected and real vertical wavelengths must be distinguished for non-vertical sounding trajectories like GPS RO, whereby the discrepancy depends on the angle defined by the LOS and the wave constant phase surfaces (e.g., Alexander et al, 2008). The deviation may be significant for mountain waves, as their phase surfaces generally differ from the local horizontal plane.…”
Section: Amplitude and Wavelength Distributionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The circumstances under which the GPS RO technique is able to resolve gravity waves were extensively discussed by Alexander et al (2008). The horizontal resolution of each measurement is in the worst case in the order of a few hundred kilometers along the LOS of the satellite (Kursinski et al, 1997).…”
Section: Los Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is accepted that w adequately highlights the main GW amplitudes and wavelengths belonging to high and medium intrinsic frequency regimes. As it is known (e.g., de la Torre and Alexander, 1995;P. Alexander et al, 2008), a distortion is introduced in the measured GW  H and  Z by atmospheric soundings performed in any other than in vertical and horizontal directions, as is the case during GPS RO events or during radiosoundings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alexander et al, 2008), a distortion is introduced in the measured GW  H and  Z by atmospheric soundings performed in any other than in vertical and horizontal directions, as is the case during GPS RO events or during radiosoundings. In the case of RO events, it is 210 known that a visibility condition imposed to the line of sight (LOS) described in P. Alexander et al (2008) must be satisfied.The distortion is more or less significant, depending on the elevation angle of the sounding path and the GW aspect ratio (de la Torre et al, 2017, hereafter respectively, are distinguished. In this case study we observe in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%