2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of combined infrared, submillimeter, and millimeter thermal flux data obtained during the Rosetta fly-by of Asteroid (21) Lutetia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Delbo et al 2007) and that our midto far-IR data originate in the top layer of the surface. We do not see any signatures of sub-surface layers where the thermal inertia could be significantly higher (Keihm et al 2012).…”
Section: Comparison With Ao and Speckle Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Delbo et al 2007) and that our midto far-IR data originate in the top layer of the surface. We do not see any signatures of sub-surface layers where the thermal inertia could be significantly higher (Keihm et al 2012).…”
Section: Comparison With Ao and Speckle Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…For a detailed discussion of the results from mid-IR observations of small bodies carried out by in situ missions such as Dawn and Rosetta, the reader is referred to chapters by Barucci et al and Russel et al (this volume). These missions gathered thermal IR maps of bodies such as (2867) Steins (Leyrat et al 2011), (21) Lutetia, and (4) Vesta (Keihm et al 2012;Tosi et al 2014;Capria et al 2014). …”
Section: The Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subpixel roughness can be regarded as a measure of the surface irregularity at a scale smaller than the shape model (of the order of 20 m) and larger than the thermal skin depth (of the order of 1 cm, expressed, in the case of the diurnal cycle, as D = √ KP / πρc , where P is the rotation period). It can be interpreted, for example, as the percentage of cratered terrain with respect to flat terrain [ Müller and Lagerros , ; Keihm et al ., ]. High values of the ξ parameter will increase the computed surface temperature, while low values, indicating a flatter surface, will have an opposite effect.…”
Section: Thermophysical Classification Of the Surface Of Vestamentioning
confidence: 99%