1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf02291696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of canonical analysis: Rotated vs. unrotated solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this type of solution, rotation preserves many optimization properties provided it takes place in certain ways and in a subspace of the corresponding hyperspace. Rotation from the maximum intervariate correlation structure into a different, simpler, and more meaningful structure increases the interpretability of the canonical weights [12]. This procedure was adopted in order to define the operational conditions within the optimization region providing the best TPH removal results.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this type of solution, rotation preserves many optimization properties provided it takes place in certain ways and in a subspace of the corresponding hyperspace. Rotation from the maximum intervariate correlation structure into a different, simpler, and more meaningful structure increases the interpretability of the canonical weights [12]. This procedure was adopted in order to define the operational conditions within the optimization region providing the best TPH removal results.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this type of solution, rotation leaves many optimizing properties preserved, provided it takes place in certain ways and in a subspace of its corresponding hyperspace. This rotation from the maximum intervariate correlation structure into a different, simpler, and more meaningful structure increases the interpretability of the canonical weights (Cliff and Krus 1976). This procedure was adopted in order to define the operational condition within the optimization region, so that the best TPH removal results could be obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canonical analysis was used in this study (Cliff and Krus 1976) Analyses of TPH The TPH dosage was performed according to the methodology described by Vieira et al (2007). To measure the amount of TPH, hydrochloric acid was added to 10 ml of effluent to achieve a pH of 2 or less.…”
Section: Determination Of the Stationary Point For Tph Removal (Maximmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…]) and the themes that were extracted in Stage 1 and quantitized in Stage 2 via the inter-respondent matrix. Specifically, a canonical correlation analysis (Cliff & Krus, 1976;Darlington, Weinberg, & Walberg, 1973;Thompson, 1980Thompson, , 1984 was used to examine the multivariate relationship between the selected demographic variables and the themes. For each statistically significant canonical coefficient, standardized coefficients and structure coefficients were computed, which served as inferential-based effect sizes (Onwuegbuzie, 2003a).…”
Section: Stage 4: Confirmatory Stagementioning
confidence: 99%