2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of bond failure through conversion and residual solvent measurements and Weibull analyses of flexural and microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
123
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
123
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The conversion of the resin decreased from ~54% to ~25% when more than 20% water was added [17]. The extent of monomer conversion [19][20][21][22] and the presence of phase separations in the presence of water [6,[23][24][25][26] during polymerization are very influential on the structure and properties of the resulting polymer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversion of the resin decreased from ~54% to ~25% when more than 20% water was added [17]. The extent of monomer conversion [19][20][21][22] and the presence of phase separations in the presence of water [6,[23][24][25][26] during polymerization are very influential on the structure and properties of the resulting polymer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure analysis suggested that the groups showing low bond strength (Xeno III and 3 ㎜ hole) result in a higher incidence of 'failure at the top of the hybrid layer'than the groups showing high bond strength (SBMP and 1 ㎜ hole, Table 2 and Figure 3). Since the 'failure at the top of the hybrid layer'was mainly composed of plain detached area, it could originate from early debonding between the hybrid layer and adhesive layer, which was developed by the contraction stress from the polymerizing resin composite at an early stage of the bonding procedure 10,23) . It is well accepted that increased bonded area increases the inherent defect and as a result, decreases bond strength.…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, even if the bonding agent is cured properly following the manufacturer' s instruction, the initial strength of the adhesive layer is so poor that it cannot resist the shrinkage stress of the polymerizing resin composite. The shrinkage stress may result in cracks within the bonded complex during an early stage of the filling procedure 10) and may lead to gap formation, marginal discoloration, postoperative sensitivity, and secondary caries 11) . The bond strength at each wall within a cavity may be affected by the bond strength, named here as bond quality, of the bonding agent applied to the other walls within the cavity, as well as the ratio of bonded/unbonded area.…”
Section: ⅰ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stresses are undesirable because they are associated with defects, post-operative sensitivity, and secondary caries. [3][4][5] In the past few years, several strategies have been undertaken to develop dental resin systems with reduced shrinkage. One was the preparation of oligomers of methyl methacrylate with higher molecular weights than the BIS-GMA-based systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%