The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(97)00215-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility fabric of ignimbrites in terms of kinematic and sedimentological mechanisms: An Anatolian case-study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies (Khan 1962, Bolshakov & Skorodkin 1967, Le Pennée et al 1998, Zanella et al 1999 showed that the degree of magnetic anisotropy in volcanic rocks is usually low, less than 10%, while the bulk susceptibility ranges according to the magnetic mineralogy, but most commonly is of the order of 10" 3 -10" 2 SI. The low anisotropy suggests that the orientation mechanism of ferromagnetic minerals is not very effective.…”
Section: General Character Of Ams In Volcanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies (Khan 1962, Bolshakov & Skorodkin 1967, Le Pennée et al 1998, Zanella et al 1999 showed that the degree of magnetic anisotropy in volcanic rocks is usually low, less than 10%, while the bulk susceptibility ranges according to the magnetic mineralogy, but most commonly is of the order of 10" 3 -10" 2 SI. The low anisotropy suggests that the orientation mechanism of ferromagnetic minerals is not very effective.…”
Section: General Character Of Ams In Volcanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the flow plane and/or direc tion, of these rocks has been demonstrated in volcanic formations throughout the world (e.g. Dragoni et al 1997, Le Pennée et al 1998, Smith 1998, Varga et al 1998, Archanjo et al 2000, Canon-Tapia & Pinkerton 2000. The method favours great acceptance because: it exhibits high sensitivity, is non time-consuming and can be applied to a variety of formations -lava flows, pyroclastic deposits, ash and tuff flows, ignimbrites, sills and dykes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K 1 axis is usually interpreted to be parallel to the flow direction and thus plunges towards the source (Knight et al, 1986). The use of the K 1 axis alone as a proxy for flow direction is not always reliable (Seaman et al, 1991;Hillhouse and Wells, 1991;Ort, 1993;Le Pennec et al, 1998) and a different methodology must be used to interpret the magnetic data. The imbrication angle of the magnetic foliation plane, which equivalents the deviation of the K 3 axes from the normal to the macroscopic flow plane, offers another method to distinguish the flow direction of ignimbrite (Henry, 1980;Thompson and Oldfield, 1986) (Fig.…”
Section: Sampling Methods and Ams Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum axis (K 1 ) is typically interpreted to be parallel to the flow direction and thus plunges towards the source [11]. The use of the K 1 susceptibility axis alone as a proxy for flow direction is not always reliable [11,13,[20][21][22], and a different approach must be used to interpret the AMS data. The imbrication angle of the magnetic foliation plane, which equals the deviation of the K 3 axes from the normal to the macroscopic flow plane, provides an alternative method to discern the flow direction of ignimbrite deposits [23,24].…”
Section: Sampling Methods and Ams Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%