1966
DOI: 10.2307/2257963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of a Vegetational Mosaic on Limestone in the Island of Gotland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have shown that essentially similar ordinations of natural data are obtained when different importance measures are used ( Gimingham et al 1966, Bannister 1966, Goff and Cottam 1967. However, a readily interpretable presentation of species relations cannot be implied from the consistency of the results alone because bellshaped curves and zero values may distort all ordination patterns compared.…”
Section: Specific Comments On Current Uses Of Ordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies have shown that essentially similar ordinations of natural data are obtained when different importance measures are used ( Gimingham et al 1966, Bannister 1966, Goff and Cottam 1967. However, a readily interpretable presentation of species relations cannot be implied from the consistency of the results alone because bellshaped curves and zero values may distort all ordination patterns compared.…”
Section: Specific Comments On Current Uses Of Ordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to evaluate this type of ordination for the display and interpretation of vegetational patterns have been largely based on analyses of natural data (e.g., Gittins 1965a, b, Gimingham, Pritchard, and Cormack 1966, Orloci 1966, Goff and Cottam 1%7, Bannister 1968). However, relational patterns among many species in an area are obscured by chance circumstances, by local environmental effects, and by sampling errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of the method is that the subjective ordering of dominants becomes difficult when there are more than about five of them, or when a single overriding gradient cannot account for most of the variation (Gimingham et al, 1966;Buell et al, 1966). In any case only one such catena can be extracted.…”
Section: A Leading Dominants Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation improves DA V (the measure of distortion on the first axis) in the range of 0 to 5 half-changes. Thus the most appropriate transform should be neither the logarithm (Frydman and Whittaker 1968), nor arcsin (Loucks 1962), nor reciprocal ( Gimingham et a!. 1966), but the inverse of a complemented, non-standardized error function.…”
Section: Half-changesmentioning
confidence: 99%