2002
DOI: 10.1080/09669580208667156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation in National Parks: Some Critical Questions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This barrier has been previously identified (Abascal et al, 2015;JDSP, 2009;Nielsen et al, 2008;Ruhanen et al, 2015b). Some studies have pointed out the importance of visitor awareness (information) about local Indigenous groups and their relation to the area (Carr, 2004;Staiff, Bushell, & Kennedy, 2002). In this case study, there were two types of lack of awareness.…”
Section: Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This barrier has been previously identified (Abascal et al, 2015;JDSP, 2009;Nielsen et al, 2008;Ruhanen et al, 2015b). Some studies have pointed out the importance of visitor awareness (information) about local Indigenous groups and their relation to the area (Carr, 2004;Staiff, Bushell, & Kennedy, 2002). In this case study, there were two types of lack of awareness.…”
Section: Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, this is not to say that themes should be strictly scientifically defined, but that by consulting the design approach to science content one can create themes that tap into the aesthetical resources of science. Although this aesthetic side of creating and presenting science content is crucial in creating effective nature experience, it is still considered separate from the science content itself or even subordinate to it [45]. This presents a deep misunderstanding of the nature of science and an enormous lost opportunity for producing high-quality science content.…”
Section: Science Content Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capturing the complexity of cultural landscapes presents a number of challenges for interpretation including: 1) communicating the multiple, potentially conflicting meanings in the landscape (Staiff et al 2002); 2) capturing the 'living' dimension of cultural landscapes (Blyth et al 2001;Beck and Somerville 2002); 3) dealing with changing authorship and narrative in cultural landscapes through time; and 4) sensitively and appropriately integrating Indigenous knowledge systems into interpretation programmes (Pfister 2000;Zeppel2001;Faggetter 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%