2023
DOI: 10.3390/ma16134578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretable Predictive Modelling of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Concrete Splitting Tensile Strength Using Ensemble Machine Learning Methods and SHAP Approach

Abstract: Basalt fibers are a type of reinforcing fiber that can be added to concrete to improve its strength, durability, resistance to cracking, and overall performance. The addition of basalt fibers with high tensile strength has a particularly favorable impact on the splitting tensile strength of concrete. The current study presents a data set of experimental results of splitting tests curated from the literature. Some of the best-performing ensemble learning techniques such as Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, XGBoost and LightGBM models demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving test set R 2 values of 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. This aligns with the findings of [85], who reported R 2 values of 0. (e) (f) (g) In Table 4, the values comparing the performance of the seven optimal models are presented, and Figure 5 illustrates the performance of the models based on Table 4.…”
Section: Final Model Selectionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, XGBoost and LightGBM models demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving test set R 2 values of 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. This aligns with the findings of [85], who reported R 2 values of 0. (e) (f) (g) In Table 4, the values comparing the performance of the seven optimal models are presented, and Figure 5 illustrates the performance of the models based on Table 4.…”
Section: Final Model Selectionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In contrast, XGBoost and LightGBM models demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving test set R 2 values of 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. This aligns with the findings of[85], who reported R 2 values of 0.93 for XGBoost and 0.94 for LightGBM. Secondly, looking at the RMSE and MAE values on the test set, the linear regression model…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that the ensemble learning model is much better than the standalone model [24]. Cakiroglu et al used Extreme Gradient Boosting, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Random Forest, and Categorical Boosting to predict the splitting tensile strength of concrete reinforced with basalt fibers [25]. Feng et al predicted the creep behavior of recycled aggregate concrete using ensemble learning combined with SHAP and performed feature importance analysis [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have made many efforts to minimize this error. Some researchers use machine learning methods to predict the splitting strength [14][15][16][17]. Van Cauwelaert [18] provided an approximate analytical solution for the splitting tensile strength of rectangular test blocks by modifying the equation using a two-dimensional planar body stress function of infinite length in the horizontal direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%