2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretable Forward and Inverse Design of Particle Spectral Emissivity Using Common Machine-Learning Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend has also been observed in previous ML studies across the physical sciences. [ 23,35 ] While many of the R 2 coefficients are lower than ideal, a large part of this underperformance may be due to its convolution with experimental error. To understand the effects of experimental uncertainty on the predictive power, we considered an additional χ 2 metric, defined as χ2=1N(enormalipnormali)2σ2${\chi ^2} = \frac{1}{N}\sum \frac{{{{({e_{\rm{i}}} - {p_{\rm{i}}})}^2}}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}$, where N is the number of samples, e i is the experimentally‐measured value, p i is the predicted value, and σ i is the experimental uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This trend has also been observed in previous ML studies across the physical sciences. [ 23,35 ] While many of the R 2 coefficients are lower than ideal, a large part of this underperformance may be due to its convolution with experimental error. To understand the effects of experimental uncertainty on the predictive power, we considered an additional χ 2 metric, defined as χ2=1N(enormalipnormali)2σ2${\chi ^2} = \frac{1}{N}\sum \frac{{{{({e_{\rm{i}}} - {p_{\rm{i}}})}^2}}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}$, where N is the number of samples, e i is the experimentally‐measured value, p i is the predicted value, and σ i is the experimental uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend has also been observed in previous ML studies across the physical sciences. [23,35] While many of the R 2 coefficients are lower than ideal, a large part of this underperformance may be due to its convolution with experimental error. To understand the effects of experimental uncertainty on the predictive power, we considered an additional χ 2 metric, defined as 1 ( )…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DL and Machine Learning (ML) have been used, in a broad setting, to solve complex problems ranging from machine vision for self-driving vehicles 32 to automatic speech recognition 33 and spacecraft system optimization 34 37 . In the field of optics, DL has been used recently to predict and model plasmonic behavior 31 , 38 42 , grating structures 43 , 44 , ceramic metasurfaces 45 , 46 , chiral materials 47 , 48 , particles and nanosturctures 49 – 51 , and to do inverse design 31 , 41 , 50 54 . Deep-Learning has also been used extensively in the field of heat transfer for applications such as predicting thermal conductivity 55 , 56 and thermal boundary resistance 57 , studying transport phenomena 58 , optimizing integrated circuits 59 , modelling boiling heat transfer 60 , predicting thermal-optical properties 44 , 61 , 62 , and addressing thermal radiation problems 63 – 66 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we propose a methodology based on a DNN to predict the optical properties of micropyramids across a wide design space of geometries, wavelengths, and, most importantly, materials. As opposed to many other studies that provide a deep learning approach to a structure with a single material 38 , 52 , a geometry with fixed materials 44 , 47 , 51 , or a material input defined by one-hot encoding with a random forest 50 , our DNN is designed to predict the optical properties of a vast array of materials and is not constrained by material input. While there are many available machine learning methods 42 , 50 , 61 , 70 74 , we choose to utilize the deep neural network approach due to the method’s input flexibility, scalability, and the ability to extrapolate outputs from unseen inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the unprecedented development of machine learning has made it a powerful tool for solving complex computing and inverse design problems. Several studies have reported machine learning methods to facilitate the design of structural colors and inverse design of nanostructures and materials to achieve the desired optical response [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. So et al [ 28 ] achieved the simultaneous inverse design of materials and structural parameters of core–shell nanoparticles by using neural networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%