2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36280-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretability of First—Order Dynamic Logic in a Relational Calculus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11] the formalisation of natural deduction for first-order logic requires the use of multicategories [2,Def. 10], in [34, §3] the formalisation of the proof calculus for ω-closure fork algebras with urelements [35,Def. 7] (a variant of fork algebras [36,37] with a reflexive and transitive closure operator) requires the use of strict monoidal categories [29, Ch.…”
Section: Definition 28 (Proof Calculus [2])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11] the formalisation of natural deduction for first-order logic requires the use of multicategories [2,Def. 10], in [34, §3] the formalisation of the proof calculus for ω-closure fork algebras with urelements [35,Def. 7] (a variant of fork algebras [36,37] with a reflexive and transitive closure operator) requires the use of strict monoidal categories [29, Ch.…”
Section: Definition 28 (Proof Calculus [2])mentioning
confidence: 99%