2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpositional Osteotomy for Posterior Mandible Ridge Augmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Screening yielded 12 citations that potentially met the inclusion criteria, but nine papers were excluded for the following reasons: two papers regarded the possibility of using CBCT in the evaluation of bone surgery, including bone grafts, but without clinical results [15,16]; one paper was in vitro [17]; one paper was based on the fate of the donor area and not the fate of the graft [18]; two papers were based on other techniques to achieve bone augmentation-membrane alone and split-crest technique [19,20]; one paper did not aim at evaluating the outcome of CBCT [21]; and two papers regarded the use of CBCT in the planning of the implant to be inserted in the grafted area, but did not concern the graft itself [22,23].…”
Section: Review Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening yielded 12 citations that potentially met the inclusion criteria, but nine papers were excluded for the following reasons: two papers regarded the possibility of using CBCT in the evaluation of bone surgery, including bone grafts, but without clinical results [15,16]; one paper was in vitro [17]; one paper was based on the fate of the donor area and not the fate of the graft [18]; two papers were based on other techniques to achieve bone augmentation-membrane alone and split-crest technique [19,20]; one paper did not aim at evaluating the outcome of CBCT [21]; and two papers regarded the use of CBCT in the planning of the implant to be inserted in the grafted area, but did not concern the graft itself [22,23].…”
Section: Review Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of guided bone regeneration implies the use of cell-occlusive membranes for space provision over a vertical or horizontal defect, promoting the ingrowth of osteogenic cells while preventing migration of undesired cells from the overlying soft tissue (Block & Haggerty, 2009). Space maintenance by various particulate graft materials and the use of resorbable (Figure 2), non-resorbable as well as titanium-reinforced membranes has been described, while no indications regarding the choice of simultaneous vs. delayed implant placement have yet been defined (Chiapasco et al, 2006).…”
Section: Guided Bone Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean increase in horizontal and vertical dimensions of 2.6 mm and 3.6 mm, respectively, has been reported (Jensen & Terheyden, 2009) with up to 40% of initial bone gain undergoing resorption thereafter (Chiapasco et al, 2009). Failures are mainly related to premature membrane exposure that has been seen in up to 38% of cases (Block & Haggerty, 2009) and may lead to infection and eventually partial or total loss of regenerated bone.…”
Section: Guided Bone Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations