2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpopulation Variation in Contour Feather Structure Is Environmentally Determined in Great Tits

Abstract: BackgroundThe plumage of birds is important for flying, insulation and social communication. Contour feathers cover most of the avian body and among other functions they provide a critical insulation layer against heat loss. Feather structure and composition are known to vary among individuals, which in turn determines variation in the insulation properties of the feather. However, the extent and the proximate mechanisms underlying this variation remain unexplored.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe analyzed cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, wintering American goldfinches Carduelis tristis have denser plumage and larger proportion of plumulaceous barbs than migrating ones (Middleton ). Broggi et al () found that great tits in northern Finland had denser feather structures than great tits in southern Sweden, with markedly less variation within the populations. A common garden experiment revealed that the population difference was due to environmental effects as great tits from the southern population developed denser feathers when they were raised in the northern population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, wintering American goldfinches Carduelis tristis have denser plumage and larger proportion of plumulaceous barbs than migrating ones (Middleton ). Broggi et al () found that great tits in northern Finland had denser feather structures than great tits in southern Sweden, with markedly less variation within the populations. A common garden experiment revealed that the population difference was due to environmental effects as great tits from the southern population developed denser feathers when they were raised in the northern population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…no difference between replicates) on any morphological and parasitological measures (P > 0.5); therefore, the data of birds from different aviaries within groups were pooled. As a result of the significant associations among different feather quality measures (Broggi et al, 2011), we tested the independent explanatory value of each traits. Data were examined for normality and homogeneity of variance (Bartlett test) and most were found to satisfy these assumptions, necessary for parametric analysis, except some of the repeated measures of the coccidian infestation, uropygial gland size, and wing size (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in colouration can be caused by a modification of the structure in which pigments are embedded (feathers, hair, cuticle, scales), melanoblast migration and differentiation as well as melanosome structure (Fitzpatrick, ; Roulin & Ducrest, ; D'Alba et al ., ). For instance, poor body condition can negatively affect feather microstructure (DesRochers et al ., ; Broggi et al ., ) and, as a consequence, modify colouration, even if the amount of pigments is not altered (D'Alba et al ., ). Assuming that melanin production occurs in a fixed amount of time, variations in feather growth rates (Dawson et al ., ) may also determine the surface coloured by melanin pigments (Vagasi, Pap & Barta, ).…”
Section: Proximate Mechanisms Of the Covariation Between Melanin‐basementioning
confidence: 99%