2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2014.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpolation scheme for fictitious domain techniques and topology optimization of finite strain elastic problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
162
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One well-known issue is the occurrence of artificial instabilities in the void phase of the design domain which affect the convergence of the Newton-Raphson solver. Several strategies for solving this problem have been presented in the literature including modified material interpolation schemes [35], an element removal strategy [34] and the element connectivity parameterization method [36]. However, these instabilities mainly occur in structures that undergo very large displacements such as compliant mechanisms.…”
Section: Geometric Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One well-known issue is the occurrence of artificial instabilities in the void phase of the design domain which affect the convergence of the Newton-Raphson solver. Several strategies for solving this problem have been presented in the literature including modified material interpolation schemes [35], an element removal strategy [34] and the element connectivity parameterization method [36]. However, these instabilities mainly occur in structures that undergo very large displacements such as compliant mechanisms.…”
Section: Geometric Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pursuing more realistic designs, continuous efforts have been conducted to extend topology optimization to nonlinear structural designs considering various sources of nonlinearity, such as geometrical nonlinearity (e.g., Buhl et al 2000;Gea and Luo 2001;Pedersen et al 2001;Bruns and Tortorelli 2003;Yoon and Kim 2005;Wang et al 2014;Luo et al 2015), material nonlinearity (e.g., Yuge and Kikuchi 1995;Bendsøe et al 1996;Maute et al 1998;Yuge et al 1999;Schwarz et al 2001;Yoon and Kim 2007;Bogomolny and Amir 2012), and both geometrical and material nonlinearities simultaneously (e.g., Jung and Gea 2004;Huang and Xie 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To more closely obtain a distinct 0‐1 design, a Heaviside thresholding technique() and material penalization are combined. First, the continuous filtered density truec˜ is thresholded using a smoothed Heaviside step function H ∗ , according to c=Hfalse(truec˜false)=tanhfalse(βHωfalse)+tanh()βHfalse(truec˜ωfalse)tanhfalse(βHωfalse)+tanh()βHfalse(1ωfalse), where c ∈ [0, 1] is deemed the physical volume fraction field.…”
Section: Regularization and Materials Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%