2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-018-0795-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpolation Error Bounds for Curvilinear Finite Elements and Their Implications on Adaptive Mesh Refinement

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Noname manuscript No.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Returning to the physical DG weak form, Eq. ( 13), as discussed in [43,67], there is no claim that the physical flux has a polynomial basis function expansion for curvilinear elements. We term the scheme "nonconservative" because it does not recover the definition of the reference divergence operator in Eq.…”
Section: Dg -Non-conservative Strong Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Returning to the physical DG weak form, Eq. ( 13), as discussed in [43,67], there is no claim that the physical flux has a polynomial basis function expansion for curvilinear elements. We term the scheme "nonconservative" because it does not recover the definition of the reference divergence operator in Eq.…”
Section: Dg -Non-conservative Strong Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As highlighted by the SBP community [41,42,40], discrete integration by parts is not satisfied in the physical space for curvilinear coordinates. This is due to the physical flux never explicitly being represented by an interpolating polynomial in the physical space [43]. This distinction, to the authors' knowledge, has not been investigated within the ESFR and DG communities [44,45,46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The metric field's own intrinsic curvature may derive from any error estimate, be it boundary approximation error [37,38] or an interpolation error estimate. So far, interpolation error estimates on high-order elements are limited to isotropy ([39] in L 2 and [40] in L 1 norms) or require that the curvature of the element be bounded, essentially establishing a range where it may be considered linear [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lebesgue constant depends only on the grid nodes. Many publications have been devoted to it [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In paper [15] the results for the Lebesgue constants and the behavior of the Lebesgue functions in view of the optimal interpolation points are given.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%