Interpol review of forensic management, 2019–2022

McAndrew, William P.; Speaker, Paul J.; Houck, Max M.

doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100301

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 93 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Subsequently to these publications, there have been several manuscripts that highlight the key role of intelligence involving the crime laboratory [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. While these manuscripts address the role of intelligence in general, other contributions to the literature address the role of intelligence in specific areas of investigation including crime scene investigation [58,59], DNA [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78], digital evidence [79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88], document examination [89][90][91], drugs-controlled substances [38,…”

Section: Recent Literature On Forensic Intelligencementioning

confidence: 99%

Intelligence and the Value of Forensic Science

Speaker

2024

Forensic Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent research has seen a rapid expansion in the reference to front-end forensics as an indication of the untapped value of forensic science. While some of these contributions have centered on development of forensic intelligence from a single area of investigation, others call for a more fundamental change in the relationship between crime laboratories and policing, particularly relating early laboratory analysis with big datasets to provide leads to investigators. We highlight several recently implemented tactical strategies of crime laboratories that contribute to the body of forensic intelligence. Beyond the scientific gains from these tactical applications, the corresponding details on associated efficiencies, costs, time savings, and quality improvements offer insights towards patterns of success for the community of crime laboratories. Further details expand an interpretation of what constitutes success with an eye on the contributions of the crime laboratory towards public health, safety, and protection of the innocent in addition to societal gains from conviction of the guilty. The economic interpretation of the value provided by the forensic laboratory assists in the cost–benefit review of strategic and tactical decisions and supports the justification for laboratory public funding with measures of the return on investment from public support of the forensic laboratory. Examples of the cost savings from crimes avoided include the returns from testing the backlog of unsubmitted sexual assault kits with USD 81 of costs avoided for each USD 1 spent to high-efficiency laboratories achieving gains of USD 646 for each UD 1 spent on de novo case submissions.

show abstract