2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpol review of fire investigation 2016–2019

Abstract: This review paper covers the forensic-relevant literature in fire analysis and investigation sciences from 2016 to 2019 as a part of the 19th Interpol International Forensic Science Managers Symposium. The review papers are also available at the Interpol website at: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/14458/file/Interpol%20Review%20Papers%202019.pdf .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The INTERPOL reviews are undertaken by multiple authors who, after extensively surveying the literature, summarize all the information in individual reviews covering specific evidence types, which are combined into one final report. The most recent edition from 2019 covered 15 major topic areas reviewed by 43 authors ranging between 1 and 11 authors per area or per evidence type (Almirall et al, 2020; Baiker‐Sørensen et al, 2020; Bécue et al, 2020; Butler & Willis, 2020; Chan et al, 2020; Charles et al, 2020; N. S. Jones & Comparin, 2020; Klapec et al, 2020; Lepot et al, 2020; Ludik, 2020; Mattijssen, 2020; Stauffer, 2020). The style and format of the individual reviews vary greatly depending on the topic being covered, some being more descriptive than others in their analyses of the cited references.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The INTERPOL reviews are undertaken by multiple authors who, after extensively surveying the literature, summarize all the information in individual reviews covering specific evidence types, which are combined into one final report. The most recent edition from 2019 covered 15 major topic areas reviewed by 43 authors ranging between 1 and 11 authors per area or per evidence type (Almirall et al, 2020; Baiker‐Sørensen et al, 2020; Bécue et al, 2020; Butler & Willis, 2020; Chan et al, 2020; Charles et al, 2020; N. S. Jones & Comparin, 2020; Klapec et al, 2020; Lepot et al, 2020; Ludik, 2020; Mattijssen, 2020; Stauffer, 2020). The style and format of the individual reviews vary greatly depending on the topic being covered, some being more descriptive than others in their analyses of the cited references.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most accepted and utilized method for analyzing ILRs involves the extraction of the volatile compounds using ASTM methods for headspace sampling or dynamic headspace concentration testing. 139 The extracted compounds are then analyzed using GC-MS to determine the presence or absence of ILRs and to classify the ignitable liquid. However, for analyzing fire debris samples, there has been some research which examines the use of FTIR and Raman spectroscopies.…”
Section: T H Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, Stauffer published an interpole review of fire investigation research conducted between the years 2016 and 2019. 139 This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the phenomenon of fire and the examination of fire scenes and laboratory evidence. While the bulk of the articles referenced used GC-MS methods, some spectroscopy articles were included.…”
Section: T H Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review covers research in the areas of fire debris analysis and fire investigations since the 19th International Forensic Science Managers Symposium in 2019. The literature includes forensic and fire-related articles, standards, and books published since 2019 to complete the previous review by Stauffer in 2016 [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%