2019
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6933-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay of scalar and fermionic components in a multi-component dark matter scenario

Abstract: We explore the multi-component dark matter (DM) scenario considered in a simple extension of the standard model with an inert scalar doublet and a singlet fermionic field providing the two DM candidates. The DM states are made stable under the unbroken Z 2 × Z 2 discrete symmetry. An additional gauge singlet scalar field is introduced to facilitate the interaction of the dark fermion with the visible sector. Presence of a charged fermionic field having the same Z 2 charge as that of the inert scalar field allo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non observation of DM in direct search experiments like LUX [25], XENON 1T [25][26][27], Panda X [28] put a stringent bound on this model (with mass below 1 TeV getting disallowed) due to its prediction of large spin independent (SI) direct search cross section. As an alternative, multi-component DM scenarios [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] are proposed where DM-DM interactions (see for example, [39,40]) play an important role to evade direct search bound.Such an attempt was made in [39], where two singlet scalars serve as two DM components, that satisfy required DM constraints. However, the framework is unable to accommodate the low mass region corresponding to both the DM's masses, simultaneously below 500 GeV, to satisfy DM direct search bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non observation of DM in direct search experiments like LUX [25], XENON 1T [25][26][27], Panda X [28] put a stringent bound on this model (with mass below 1 TeV getting disallowed) due to its prediction of large spin independent (SI) direct search cross section. As an alternative, multi-component DM scenarios [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] are proposed where DM-DM interactions (see for example, [39,40]) play an important role to evade direct search bound.Such an attempt was made in [39], where two singlet scalars serve as two DM components, that satisfy required DM constraints. However, the framework is unable to accommodate the low mass region corresponding to both the DM's masses, simultaneously below 500 GeV, to satisfy DM direct search bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different multicomponent dark matter models including both thermal and non-thermal dark matter candidates have been explored in the Refs. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. In multicomponent dark matter models one of the candidates shares a fraction of total DM relic abundance and the other candidate provides the required amount of relic density in order to satisfy the total DM relic density observed by Planck [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such null results have not only motivated the studies of beyond thermal WIMP paradigm but also a richer DM sector consisting of multiple DM components. Some recent proposals for multi-component DM can be found in [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94] and references therein. As several of these works pointed out, apart from having larger allowed region of parameter space due to freedom of tuning relative DM abundances, such multi-component DM scenarios often offer complementary probes at experiments spanning out to different frontiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%