2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.100.134416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay of magnetic field and interlayer coupling in the quasi-two-dimensional quantum magnet Cu(en)Cl2 : Realization of the spin-1/2 rectangular/zigzag square Heisenberg lattice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the magnetic contribution dominates at low temperatures, its behavior in Cu­(tn)­Cl 2 is quite different from that encountered in similar compound Cu­(en)­Cl 2 (en=ethylenediamine = C 2 H 8 N 2 ). There is a sharp λ-like anomaly in the specific heat of Cu­(en)­Cl 2 below 1 K, which is typical for the magnetic phase transition and the onset of long-range order . Such a behavior is, however, not observed in the low-temperature specific heat of Cu­(tn)­Cl 2 , which exhibits a broad hump in the vicinity of 2 K. These differences are likely to result from much stronger interlayer magnetic interactions in Cu­(en)­Cl 2 in comparison to those in Cu­(tn)­Cl 2 and they remain correlated with differences in the low-temperature crystal structures of these compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although the magnetic contribution dominates at low temperatures, its behavior in Cu­(tn)­Cl 2 is quite different from that encountered in similar compound Cu­(en)­Cl 2 (en=ethylenediamine = C 2 H 8 N 2 ). There is a sharp λ-like anomaly in the specific heat of Cu­(en)­Cl 2 below 1 K, which is typical for the magnetic phase transition and the onset of long-range order . Such a behavior is, however, not observed in the low-temperature specific heat of Cu­(tn)­Cl 2 , which exhibits a broad hump in the vicinity of 2 K. These differences are likely to result from much stronger interlayer magnetic interactions in Cu­(en)­Cl 2 in comparison to those in Cu­(tn)­Cl 2 and they remain correlated with differences in the low-temperature crystal structures of these compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%