2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.092401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay of heating and helicity in all-optical magnetization switching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the value of F min for pulse trains is above the value for unshaped pulses is understandable in terms of heat related effects. As it was shown in 8 a certain amount of heating is needed to obtain AOS. If in the case of a pulse train the irradiated sample area is already slightly cooled down between the single pulses, the total fluence of the pulse train must be higher compared to F min of the unshaped pulse to deliver the needed amount of heating.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that the value of F min for pulse trains is above the value for unshaped pulses is understandable in terms of heat related effects. As it was shown in 8 a certain amount of heating is needed to obtain AOS. If in the case of a pulse train the irradiated sample area is already slightly cooled down between the single pulses, the total fluence of the pulse train must be higher compared to F min of the unshaped pulse to deliver the needed amount of heating.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The reason is that the heating due to the pulses following the x th pulse must be low enough to not exceed the thermal demagnetization threshold. Furthermore, it was shown in 8 that two pulses following each other with a delay of a few picoseconds both contribute to the switching. In the following we therefore assume that all pulses influence the switching process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation lead to a debate as to the origin of the ultrafast switching [7,8]. The inverse Faraday effect (IFE) was originally proposed as the key driving mechanism for the reversal [6,9,10]. A further complication to the debate on all-optical switching (AOS) was presented in 2012 by Ostler et al where single 50 fs laser pulses were shown to drive deterministic magnetization reversal for both left, right, and linearly polarized light [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[31][32][33][34][35][36] Recently we showed that a minimum amount of laser energy input of the order of the energy gap between the two ferrimagnetic modes, i.e.h∆ω ∼hω ex ∼ J RT (M FeCo (T 0 ) − M Gd (T 0 )), is required for the formation of the TFLS, 11 where ω ex is the frequency of the so-called antiferromagnetic coherent exchange mode. The disordered nature of the GdFeCo spin lattice leads an effect that the most efficient energy transfer (the smallest energy gap) does not correspond exactly to the coherent mode with k = 0 but to non-zero k value, related to the characteristic length of the Gd spins cluster size.…”
Section: B Formation Of the Transient Ferromagnetic Like Statementioning
confidence: 99%