Interplay between trust and distrust in the workplace: examining the effect of psychological contract breach on organizational disidentification

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the effect of psychological contract breach on organizational disidentification through the “affect-based” mediating mechanisms of trust and distrust. Design/methodology/approach Using a convenient sampling technique, cross-sectional data were collected from 281 doctors working in public sector health-care organizations in Pakistan. After initial data screening, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the measurement models’ validity and reliability. The hypothesized relationships were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) with AMOS. Findings The results of this study showed that psychological contract breach had significant direct and indirect positive effects through the mediating mechanism of distrust on organizational identification. However, trust was not supported as a mediator in that relationship. Research limitations/implications This study uses cross-sectional data. Other researchers should use longitudinal design with two or three time lags. This study uses a sample of doctors from different cities of Pakistan, as this is a global era, so results cannot be generalized; this opens the future avenue for other scholars to select a broad sample from multiple organizations like businesses and NGOs from different countries or to use it in different context. The authors have used single source (questionnaires) and quantitative method to collect data for this study, so there is a probability of self-report bias. As future is of mixed method, so future researchers should use mixed method for deep and thorough understanding of different selected phenomena. Practical implications Due to the experiences of breach of psychological contract, the doctors may either lose trust or may experience distrust which may further reduce their level of identification in an organization. Their contribution toward best interest of hospital decreases and their willingness to identify with their working place declines. Practically, the authors have compared that it is either the trust or distrust which can lead to organizational disidentification among doctors. Social implications The findings will help employers and hospital authorities to understand that doctors are the most important strategic element of every hospital. Having sound financial, physical and informational capital is incomplete and worthless if there is no “doctor”. Because they have to deal directly with patients, so in this case, they are most important and crucial. A doctor’s identification and their loyalty with high level of trust directly on employer and indirectly on hospital all contributes toward an organization’s long-term success, and ultimately for the success of society. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing literature on the consequences of employees’ psychological contract breach by simultaneously testing trust and distrust as the two competing affect-based mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and organizational disidentification.

Organizational injustice and knowledge hiding: the roles of organizational dis-identification and benevolence

“…By combining SIT with equity theory, this study makes several pertinent contributions to extant research. First, it elucidates how organizational injustice might increase knowledge hiding because employees feel less motivated to incorporate their organization's identity into their self-concepts (Lai et al , 2013; Rani et al , 2018). Second, it clarifies when this translation of perceived injustice into knowledge hiding, through organizational dis-identification, might be less likely to occur.…”

Why Do People Hide Knowledge in the Online Knowledge Community? An Integrated Framework of Protection Motivation, Self-Determination, and Social Exchange Beliefs

“…Trust among group members is essential in information exchange and transfer [112]. Trust is the expectation of an individual or a group that other individuals' or groups' statements, promises, words, or behavior can be relied on [113]. Practitioners indicate that trust improves the overall exchange of knowledge and makes it less expensive [46,114].…”

Impact of shared goals on knowledge hiding behavior: the moderating role of trust

“…Trust in team members is vital and indispensable in information disclosure (Chen et al, 2016) and essential for exchange or transfer of knowledge and expertise among team members with shared goals (Zhou et al, 2010). Trust is the expectancy of an individual, group or a team member that the written/verbal statement, promise or word of another individual, group or a team member can be relied on (Rani et al, 2018;Rotter, 1980). Practitioners report that trust leads to the improvement of the overall exchange of knowledge and makes it less costly (Abrams et al, 2003).…”