The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2018)120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay between the holographic QCD phase diagram and entanglement entropy

Abstract: In earlier work, we introduced a dynamical Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton model which mimics essential features of QCD (thermodynamics) below and above deconfinement. Although there are some subtle differences in the confining regime of our model as compared to the standard results, we do have a temperature dependent dual metric below T c as well, allowing for a richer and more realistic holographic modeling of the QCD phase structure. We now discuss how these features leave their imprints on the associated entangle… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
8
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We see that there is a small quantitive difference in the right inserts of both plots: the coordinates of the saddle points for µ = 0.2 are z * | ν=1.5 = 0.7146, c| ν=1.5 = 0.4590 and z * | ν=1 = 0.9361, c| ν=1 = 0.1170 (A), and for µ = 0.5 are z * | ν=1.5 = 0.71748, c| ν=1.5 = 0.46135 and z * | ν=1 = 0.8489, c| ν=1 = 0.14450 (B). The multi-valued dependency on z * in holographic models was previously observed in [54]. The authors established a new type of the phase transition associated with the swallow-tail like structure for S HEE as the function of .…”
Section: 42mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We see that there is a small quantitive difference in the right inserts of both plots: the coordinates of the saddle points for µ = 0.2 are z * | ν=1.5 = 0.7146, c| ν=1.5 = 0.4590 and z * | ν=1 = 0.9361, c| ν=1 = 0.1170 (A), and for µ = 0.5 are z * | ν=1.5 = 0.71748, c| ν=1.5 = 0.46135 and z * | ν=1 = 0.8489, c| ν=1 = 0.14450 (B). The multi-valued dependency on z * in holographic models was previously observed in [54]. The authors established a new type of the phase transition associated with the swallow-tail like structure for S HEE as the function of .…”
Section: 42mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The Wilson loops can also be computed in HQCD. It happens that location of the confinement/deconfinement line in the (µ, T ) plane can be close to the background phase transition [54,61,76], but not necessary fit it. For special models the phase transition of the HEE can be used as an indication of the HQCD phase transition [41,55].…”
Section: Entanglement Entropy Phase Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea of [48] was then applied to many other town-down confining as well as soft wall models of holographic QCD [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. Only recently the entanglement entropy computations for the phenomenological bottom-up models, which are somewhat more appropriate to model QCD holographically [58,59], were performed and the results were similar to those reported in [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In this section, we briefly describe the EMD gravity model as well as the holographic entanglement entropy and state only the useful expressions, which will be important for our investigation in later sections. The holographic EMD gravity model at finite and zero temperature as well various expressions for the entanglement entropy have been discussed in great detail in [58,80], and we refer the reader to [58,80] for more technical details.…”
Section: Holographic Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%