2021
DOI: 10.17221/286/2021-agricecon
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay between environmental, social and governance coordinates and the financial performance of agricultural companies

Abstract: On the complex framing of the agricultural fields, related to the corporate social responsibility (CSR), the general objective of this paper is to assess the impacts of environmental, social and governance (ESG) credentials of CSR and human capital features on the financial performance of agricultural companies. The data consists of a sample of 412 public companies from the Thomson Reuters Eikon database, with data for 2020, operating in 17 agricultural areas with headquarters allocated around the world. The m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, though Diaye et al (2022) report that better ESG performance helps in the long-term economic growth of a country but fail to establish such a significant relationship for the short term. Pirtea et al (2021) in the context of large global public agricultural companies find that the impact of overall ESG score is positive for earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), negative for ROA and insignificant for return on equity (ROE). Moreover, an insignificant association is found by Shahbaz et al (2020) between socially responsible activities and firm performance in the context of firms in the global energy sector by using the fixed effects model.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, though Diaye et al (2022) report that better ESG performance helps in the long-term economic growth of a country but fail to establish such a significant relationship for the short term. Pirtea et al (2021) in the context of large global public agricultural companies find that the impact of overall ESG score is positive for earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), negative for ROA and insignificant for return on equity (ROE). Moreover, an insignificant association is found by Shahbaz et al (2020) between socially responsible activities and firm performance in the context of firms in the global energy sector by using the fixed effects model.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main causes behind this phenomenon could be elucidated from two perspectives. On the one hand, at the beginning of COVID-19, countries or regions are less able to cope with this epidemic and its corresponding consequences (e.g., high GSCP) effectively, causing to a severe recession in their economies (Pirtea et al, 2021;Cristea et al, 2022;Ekinci et al, 2022;Gamal et al, 2022). Then, people's income and purchasing power have also reduced significantly, which leads to a decline in the investment demand for bitcoin.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with China's reality that the green bond market is more easily influenced by long-run shocks than short-run shocks. As proven by Pirtea et al (2021) to external shocks such as oil price volatility (Hu et al, 2022;Yan et al, 2022). Besides, the p values for both statistics W(b EPU ) and W * (b EPU ) are observed to be lower than 0.1 since the year 2020, meaning that the null hypothesis is not able to accept during the mentioned time.…”
Section: Rolling Window Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%