2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.102.144510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay between charge density wave order and superconductivity in LaAuSb2 under pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the spin-singlet SC and 3Q-iCDW repulsively interact each other, and f CDW&SC > 0 follows from the Cauthy-Schwartz inequality. This implies the opposing behaviour between the two critical temperatures, which is consistent with the tendency observed in experiments [48][49][50][51]. We emphasize that this opposing behavior is quite independent of the pairing symmetry and the conventional CDW order parameter beyond our simple model, since the condition, f CDW&SC > 0, is robust as long as u 5 > u 4 /2.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, the spin-singlet SC and 3Q-iCDW repulsively interact each other, and f CDW&SC > 0 follows from the Cauthy-Schwartz inequality. This implies the opposing behaviour between the two critical temperatures, which is consistent with the tendency observed in experiments [48][49][50][51]. We emphasize that this opposing behavior is quite independent of the pairing symmetry and the conventional CDW order parameter beyond our simple model, since the condition, f CDW&SC > 0, is robust as long as u 5 > u 4 /2.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…While our findings can be interpreted through a competition between charge order and superconductivity, there is a notable difference compared to systems such as LaAuSb 2 [22]. In the latter case, charge order is also suppressed with increasing pressure and disappears in a first-order-like fashion at a characteristic pressure p 0 ; however, there is a sudden jump in T c and a significant drop in the residual resistivity ρ 0 across p 0 , which is not seen in KV 3 Sb 5 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…While a dome of unconventional superconductivity typically emerges as magnetic order is suppressed towards a putative quantum critical point [16][17][18], whether a similar picture holds for the interplay between charge order and superconductivity remains unsettled. Although a dome of superconductivity anchors around a charge order quantum critical point in Lu(Pt 1−x Pd x ) 2 In [19], in many other systems with coexisting superconductivity and charge order, the interplay was found to follow expectations of the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory [20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5(c)]. We note that a recent study on a very similar system showed the full suppression of the CDW at much lower pressure about ∼0.64 GPa [35]. In LaAu x Sb 2 system, it was shown that the CDW transition can be tuned by changing gold concentration [26].…”
Section: B High-pressure Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The application of pressure of ∼0.75 and ∼1.7 GPa leads to suppression of lower transition and upper transition, respectively [26]. Study of Xiang et al, did not indicate any observation of superconductivity in the LaAu x Sb 2 ; however, it should be noted that the minimum temperature they reached was 1.8 K. In contrast, a recent study by Du et al [35], showed superconductivity in LaAuSb 2 at an extremely low temperature of ∼0.6 K with a CDW transition around 78 K. Pressure of about 0.64 GPa is found to suppress the CDW transition completely which concurrently leads to an enhancement in the superconducting transition temperature to 1.05 K. Here, we investigate synchrotron xray powder-diffraction study as a function of temperature (from 390 to 110 K) and pressure (from 0 to 8.86 GPa) for LaAuSb 2 with very similar CDW properties. However, the CDW transition that we observe is about 83 K. Further, resistivity measurements as a function of temperature (300 to 4 K) under various hydrostatic pressures (0 to 3.14 GPa) and DFT calculations are performed to understand the correlation between structural and transport properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%