1983
DOI: 10.1093/past/101.1.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal Violence in English Society 1300–1980

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary. It reflects the emergence of a new normative order, one that took a dim view of assaults in general (Stone, 1983;Beattie, 1986, p. 139;King, 1996), and an even dimmer view of assaults by or against women.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary. It reflects the emergence of a new normative order, one that took a dim view of assaults in general (Stone, 1983;Beattie, 1986, p. 139;King, 1996), and an even dimmer view of assaults by or against women.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is axiomatic among social historians that interpersonal violence was far more prevalent in early modern England than it is in England today, and although assaults were becoming somewhat less common-and less tolerated -during the second half of the eighteenth century (Beattie, 1986;King, 1996;Stone 1983Stone , 1985, they were still very much a fact of everyday life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists historical support in America and Western Europe for Elias's general thesis (see Spierenberg, 1984;Gurr, 1981Gurr, ,1989Stone, 1983). The changing methods of American police interrogation may provide additional evidence consistent with a civilizing process that has transformed the cultural sensibilities of both private and state actors.…”
Section: Traditional Forms Of State Control Have Become Increasinglymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stone observed that: 'It looks as if the homicide rates in thirteenth-century England were about twice as high as those in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and that those of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were some five to ten times higher than those today.' 3 Stone's article generated a lively debate around questions of methodology and interpretation, in particular the extent to which rates could be derived with confidence when population estimates were uncertain, the degree to which shifts in annual counts of homicide reflected changes in quotidian brutishness and hostility, and the relationship between better medical treatment and the death rate from assaults. 4 However, it is probably fair to say that a consensus now exists concerning the trajectory of lethal violence, while competing claims may remain regarding its magnitude and meaning.…”
Section: Contexts Consequences and Civilizing Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%