2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal Similarity between Body Movements in Face-To-Face Communication in Daily Life

Abstract: Individuals are embedded in social networks in which they communicate with others in their daily lives. Because smooth face-to-face communication is the key to maintaining these networks, measuring the smoothness of such communication is an important issue. One indicator of smoothness is the similarity of the body movements of the two individuals concerned. A typical example noted in experimental environments is the interpersonal synchronization of body movements such as nods and gestures during smooth face-to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, in a face-to-face situation, people synchronously increase or decrease their upper-body movements. Our previous study found that if people are in a faceto-face situation, their number of body movements tends to be similar [11]. Our result suggests that we do not achieve similarity of upper-body movements by closing the gap of the amount of body movements between people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…That is, in a face-to-face situation, people synchronously increase or decrease their upper-body movements. Our previous study found that if people are in a faceto-face situation, their number of body movements tends to be similar [11]. Our result suggests that we do not achieve similarity of upper-body movements by closing the gap of the amount of body movements between people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The time series of body movements on a second scale is usually much less stable or uniform in the real world than in a laboratory setting [11]. That is, in daily situation, it would be difficult to evaluate the quality of people's communication and to support the communication from the viewpoint of second-scale coevolution like many previous studies [13]- [16], [22]- [29], [37]- [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations