2021
DOI: 10.1037/pas0000997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal Regulation Questionnaire (IRQ): Psychometric properties and gender differences in Chinese young adolescents.

Abstract: The Interpersonal Regulation Questionnaire (IRQ) is a scale developed to measure the tendency and efficacy of intrinsic interpersonal emotion regulation across positive and negative affective states. As the psychometric properties of the IRQ across cultures and different ages have not been well established, the current study was conducted to examine the applicability of the translated IRQ in a sample of Chinese young adolescents (initial n = 487; 50.20% are males; M = 14.52 years old, SD = .75). The original f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(190 reference statements)
3
8
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from this basic distinction, empathy has also been differentiated into affective and cognitive aspects, with affective empathy referring to emotion sharing and cognitive empathy referring to the mentalizing skills required to understand the other's emotion (Eisenberg et al, 2015). Although correlated with affective empathy, cognitive empathy activates different neurological circuits (Bensalah et al, 2016;Decety & Michalska, 2010) and encompasses a more diverse range of standalone constructs that do not inherently reflect affective processes (e.g., theory of mind). Given our focus on links to ER-an affective process-we focused on affective empathy and sympathy in the present metaanalysis.…”
Section: Empathy and Sympathymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from this basic distinction, empathy has also been differentiated into affective and cognitive aspects, with affective empathy referring to emotion sharing and cognitive empathy referring to the mentalizing skills required to understand the other's emotion (Eisenberg et al, 2015). Although correlated with affective empathy, cognitive empathy activates different neurological circuits (Bensalah et al, 2016;Decety & Michalska, 2010) and encompasses a more diverse range of standalone constructs that do not inherently reflect affective processes (e.g., theory of mind). Given our focus on links to ER-an affective process-we focused on affective empathy and sympathy in the present metaanalysis.…”
Section: Empathy and Sympathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even moderately high emotional arousal could disrupt this process and higher levels could result in personal distress rather than sympathy (Eisenberg et al, 2015). Nonetheless, many studies in this area conflate empathy and sympathy and/or refer to them interchangeably, and the differential association of ER with empathy versus sympathy has rarely been reported in the same study (for exceptions, see Ding et al, 2021; Liew et al, 2011; Schuetze et al, 2014). A meta-analytic examination of ER and empathy versus ER and sympathy would shed light on the conceptual and empirical utility of differentiating between empathy and sympathy and the theoretical and practical roles of ER skills in these respective other-oriented processes.…”
Section: Definitions Of Empathy Sympathy and Emotion Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining three strategies are aimed at downregulating negative emotions and entail asking others about their opinion (perspective-taking), imitating their way of dealing with emotional events (social modeling), or seeking their compassion (soothing). This set of strategies has been validated across various languages and cultures (Ding et al, 2021;Koç et al, 2019;Pruessner et al, 2020).…”
Section: Interpersonal Emotion Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study examined the original four-factor structure, two-factor structures, and the possible hierarchical factor models for the IRQ using a Chinese adolescent sample [ 20 ]. The findings suggest that the four-factor model best represented the adolescent data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, under certain circumstances (people using less maladaptive emotional regulation strategies), some IER strategies (soothing) could also reduce depression [ 33 ], and in other cases (when people use low-level inner resources in regulating their emotions), IER strategies (perspective-taking) may increase the level of depression. In studies using Chinese youth samples, the use of IER has been associated positively with positive emotions and negatively with negative emotions or distress [ 20 , 28 , 34 ]. In summary, these results suggest that the effects of IER on social and emotional well-being are mixed, and the reasons for this are worthy of further exploration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%