Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates

Introduction to Politeness and Impoliteness Research in Global Contexts

“…This theoretical point links to insights on the discursive nature of im/politeness judgements, as proposed and developed by a number of scholars (e.g. Haugh et al 2013, Linguistic Politeness Research Group 2011, Locher & Watts 2005, and as further developed in this volume by Tzanne and Sifianou (see below).…”

“…In fact, the most important contributions of the discursive turn were to remind us of the evaluative and situated nature of concepts such as impoliteness or politeness, the importance that emotions play in assessments and to argue for the link of identity construction with these processes of judging (e.g. Haugh et al 2013, Linguistic Politeness Research Group 2011, Langlotz & Locher 2017, Locher 2004, Locher and Watts 2005. It is by now standard practice to combine etic and emic approaches in order to account for the interplay between the perspectives 3 .…”

“…Eelen 2001). Наиболее существенным вкладом в него стало указание на оценочный и контекстуальный характер таких понятий, как вежливость и невежливость, на важность эмоций в их оценке и утверждение о связи этих процессов с конструированием идентичности (например, Haugh et al 2013, Linguistic Politeness Research Group 2011, Langlotz & Locher 2017, Locher 2004, Locher & Watts 2005. В настоящее время общепринято сочетать эмический и этический подходы для учета их взаимосвязи 9 .…”

Uso De La Teoria Fundamentada Para El Analisis De Datos en El Modelo De Determinantes Sociales De La Salud

“…Este ejercicio se puede desarrollar a través de varias rutas; a saber: i. Desde la Teoría de la Mente Extendida (22) , a fin de entender la comunicación como un agenciamiento entre el mundo interior y la vida en comunidad ii. Desde la pragmática intergrupal y los ritos de reconocimiento (23), (24), (25) . iii.…”

The Constitutive Metamodel: A 16-Year Review

“…Manning (2014) constructed a model of interpersonal communication research to show how eight traditions of communication theory all currently contribute to the field and to suggest how dialogue could be advanced by extending and translating theories across traditions. Haugh, Kádár, and Mills (2013) argued that the interdisciplinary field of Interpersonal Pragmatics requires a metatheory similar to the constitutive metamodel in order to facilitate more productive interaction among theoretical approaches in the field. Garcia-Jiménez (2012; used the metamodel's sociopsychological and critical traditions to develop an argument about conceptions of communication as a social force in 20th-century thought.…”